
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Details Germany's decisive regulatory action against the Chinese AI application DeepSeek, highlighting its unlawful transfer of user data to China, a country lacking adequate data protection standards under EU law (GDPR).
This move follows a precedent set by Italy and reflects a broader, pan-European consensus driven by both privacy concerns and national security allegations linking DeepSeek to China's military.
By invoking the Digital Services Act (DSA), Germany has compelled app store operators like Apple and Google to potentially remove the application, effectively creating a new enforcement paradigm and solidifying the "Brussels Effect," where EU regulations set global standards for technology.
This case serves as a critical precedent for the forthcoming EU AI Act, signaling Europe's unwavering commitment to a rights-centric regulatory model and demonstrating how technology regulation is becoming a frontier in geopolitical competition.
By Benjamin Alloul πͺ π
½π
Ύππ
΄π
±π
Ύπ
Ύπ
Ίπ
»π
ΌDetails Germany's decisive regulatory action against the Chinese AI application DeepSeek, highlighting its unlawful transfer of user data to China, a country lacking adequate data protection standards under EU law (GDPR).
This move follows a precedent set by Italy and reflects a broader, pan-European consensus driven by both privacy concerns and national security allegations linking DeepSeek to China's military.
By invoking the Digital Services Act (DSA), Germany has compelled app store operators like Apple and Google to potentially remove the application, effectively creating a new enforcement paradigm and solidifying the "Brussels Effect," where EU regulations set global standards for technology.
This case serves as a critical precedent for the forthcoming EU AI Act, signaling Europe's unwavering commitment to a rights-centric regulatory model and demonstrating how technology regulation is becoming a frontier in geopolitical competition.