Recent discoveries of the cell have prompted atheist philosopher Antony Flew to depart from his atheism and embrace a form of deism. Why? What was wrong with using naturalistic explanations to explain the cell? What does the cell reveal that render naturalistic explanations untenable? In the last 50 years, we have discovered a cell whose information capacity, machinery, and operations rival the best technology of our day. Atheist Richard Dawkins has said “Biology is the study of complicated things that give the appearance of having been designed for a purpose.” This is a fascinating statement. Could it actually be the case that the cell appears designed because it is designed? Join Jeremy, Steve, Harry, and Sam as we consider whether the naturalistic hypotheses - Chance and Physical Necessity - best explain the cell’s intricacies and complexity.