
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


In this case, the EAT was asked to consider whether significant defects in an internal appeal process, including placing the onus on the employee to nominate a manager to hear the appeal after failed attempts to convene the appeal hearing, meant that the subsequent dismissal was unfair. Listen along to find out what happened!
Visit www.indicator.co.uk to explore our product range, or connect with us on social media:
YouTube
Hosted on Ausha. See ausha.co/privacy-policy for more information.
By IndicatorIn this case, the EAT was asked to consider whether significant defects in an internal appeal process, including placing the onus on the employee to nominate a manager to hear the appeal after failed attempts to convene the appeal hearing, meant that the subsequent dismissal was unfair. Listen along to find out what happened!
Visit www.indicator.co.uk to explore our product range, or connect with us on social media:
YouTube
Hosted on Ausha. See ausha.co/privacy-policy for more information.