Cyber Law

Digital Evidence Disasters in Court โš–๏ธ


Listen Later

๐Ÿ›๏ธ The Case That Changed Digital Evidence Forever

๐ŸŒŸ What if we told you that NOT showing evidence could be worse than having bad evidence? This episode explores a shocking Supreme Court case where missing CCTV footage and call records completely changed the outcome of a murder trial!

๐Ÿ’ก What You'll Discover:

  • ๐Ÿ” Why digital evidence like CCTV footage is now considered "best evidence" in Indian courts
  • โš–๏ธ How Section 114(g) of the Evidence Act can work AGAINST you when you hide evidence
  • ๐ŸŽฏ The technical requirements of Section 65B that can make or break your digital proof
  • ๐Ÿ“ฑ Why call records, emails, and location data are legal game-changers

๐Ÿš€ Real Cases Discussed:

  • ๐Ÿ’Ž R. Dinesh Kumar vs. State (2015) - Supreme Court case where missing CCTV footage led to acquittal in a murder case
  • โญ Section 114(g) Evidence Act - The "adverse inference" rule that punishes evidence hiding
  • ๐Ÿ”ง Section 65B Evidence Act - Technical requirements for digital evidence certification

๐ŸŽ™๏ธ Whether you're a lawyer, investigator, or just curious about how digital evidence works in Indian courts, this episode reveals why proper handling of digital proof can literally determine freedom or imprisonment!

...more
View all episodesView all episodes
Download on the App Store

Cyber LawBy Sharad Bansal