U.S.-Iran talks lack sincerity; Israel's attacks are political, not strategic.

Nima Rostami Alkhorshid:

1. What is your view on the Israeli attack on Iran amid U.S. negotiations with Iran?

2. How do you assess Israel’s behavior in the Middle East, especially with recent escalations in Gaza and Iran?

3. What role do you think the United States plays in the Middle East, particularly regarding potential regime change in Iran?

Dmitry Orlov:

1. The U.S. isn’t genuinely negotiating with Iran; Trump’s approach is inconsistent and unreliable. The Israeli attack achieves little and highlights incompetence on both sides.

2. Israel’s actions are driven by domestic political needs rather than strategic success. Its military efforts in Gaza and elsewhere have failed to produce meaningful outcomes beyond destruction.

3.Regime change in Iran through targeted attacks is unrealistic. The U.S. lacks a coherent strategy, and Arab states are unlikely to get deeply involved in what is seen as a regional conflict between Israel and Iran.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.