Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
Share Does being skeptical of Spell-to-Communicate (S2C) make you ableist?
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Or
Does being skeptical of Spell-to-Communicate (S2C) make you ableist?
TOPIC SUBMISSION FORM: https://forms.gle/5AUvprN4Xtr8yxQD9
ACCESS FREE THREE MONTHS OF PATREON HERE: https://www.patreon.com/ttislp/redeem/90231
In this episode, I unpack why questioning facilitated communication variants is not the same as being ableist. I talk through the difference between respecting lived experience and still asking for authorship testing, independent access, and evidence-based practice when communication support is involved. I also reflect on the tension between advocacy, bias, and the real need to protect vulnerable people from harm while still honoring autonomy and dignity. This conversation is especially relevant for speech-language pathologists, OTs, educators, and other helping professionals navigating autism acceptance and the ethics of supporting nonspeaking communicators.
If you work with autistic clients, use AAC, or want a more nuanced take on the facilitated communication debate, this episode offers a grounded perspective for thinking critically without losing sight of compassion.
About:
The Trauma-Informed SLP website (Also includes my Work Cited page.)
Our email
YouTube Playlist for Late-Diagnosed Neurodivergents
Follow us on all the things! https://linktr.ee/TTISLP
View all episodes
By Kim Neely, CCC-SLPTOPIC SUBMISSION FORM: https://forms.gle/5AUvprN4Xtr8yxQD9
ACCESS FREE THREE MONTHS OF PATREON HERE: https://www.patreon.com/ttislp/redeem/90231
In this episode, I unpack why questioning facilitated communication variants is not the same as being ableist. I talk through the difference between respecting lived experience and still asking for authorship testing, independent access, and evidence-based practice when communication support is involved. I also reflect on the tension between advocacy, bias, and the real need to protect vulnerable people from harm while still honoring autonomy and dignity. This conversation is especially relevant for speech-language pathologists, OTs, educators, and other helping professionals navigating autism acceptance and the ethics of supporting nonspeaking communicators.
If you work with autistic clients, use AAC, or want a more nuanced take on the facilitated communication debate, this episode offers a grounded perspective for thinking critically without losing sight of compassion.
About:
The Trauma-Informed SLP website (Also includes my Work Cited page.)
Our email
YouTube Playlist for Late-Diagnosed Neurodivergents
Follow us on all the things! https://linktr.ee/TTISLP