On my blog and in a few books I argue against the theological interpretation of scripture and for a consistently <a href='https://www.postost.net/2014/09/narrative-historical-method-outline'>narrative-historical interpretation</a> of scripture. Why? Because the method makes much better sense of the texts. But can it do more than that? Can it give us better answers to the big questions about God and the universe?

On my blog and in a few books I argue against the theological interpretation of scripture and for a consistently narrative-historical interpretation of scripture. Why? Because the method makes much better sense of the texts. But can it do more than that? Can it give us better answers to the big questions about God and the universe?

On my blog and in a few books I argue against the theological interpretation of scripture and for a consistently <a href="https://www.postost.net/2014/09/narrative-historical-method-outline" rel="noopener noreferrer">narrative-historical interpretation</a> of scripture. Why? Because the method makes much better sense of the texts. But can it do more than that? Can it give us better answers to the big questions about God and the universe?

Does the narrative-historical method help us to answer the question “Why be a Christian?”

How to tell the biblical story in a way that makes a difference

Share Does the narrative-historical method help us to answer the question “Why be a Christian?”

Sign up to save your podcasts

Does the narrative-historical method help us to answer the question “Why be a Christian?”

Does the narrative-historical method help us to answer the question “Why be a Christian?”