Listeners, today we’re exploring a sharp question: government efficiency, and whether we’re DOGE-ing it wrong—borrowing the acronym from the recently shuttered Department of Government Efficiency, established in early 2025 at the suggestion of Elon Musk and launched by President Donald Trump. The DOGE initiative aimed to modernize federal operations through aggressive IT upgrades, spending cuts, workforce reductions, and a pivot toward algorithmic governance, driven largely by artificial intelligence. According to Politico, Thomas Shedd led AI.gov, accelerating the deployment of AI tools across agencies as a centerpiece of this federal push.

But just months after launch, Fortune reports DOGE has quietly ceased to exist ahead of schedule. While its direct legacy may be short-lived, its core principles—de-regulation, fraud prevention, workforce reforms, and relentless efficiency—continue to shape debate over how the government should operate in a climate increasingly impacted by emerging technologies.

If listeners are wondering why DOGE fizzled, they need only look at the turbulent policy landscape. The Brookings Institution’s analysis suggests fragmentation in digital asset regulation, with multiple agencies holding overlapping jurisdictions, creates confusion and slows innovation. Calls to merge entities like the SEC and CFTC reflect the urgency for streamlined oversight, especially as crypto and AI shape new economic realities.

Regulatory complexity goes beyond Washington. The Council of State Governments notes that in 2025 alone, 252 AI-related measures were proposed by U.S. states and territories. States are not waiting for DC—creating a patchwork of rules that President Trump argues could undermine national competitiveness. Regulatory uncertainty, as highlighted by Elliptic’s review of global crypto oversight, means compliance demands change rapidly, leaving institutions scrambling to keep up, especially those operating internationally.

Meanwhile, the UK government’s Wholesale Financial Markets Digital Strategy, published in July, actively welcomes experimentation with blockchain-powered financial services. That contrast shows that where some governments embrace efficiency-boosting tech, others flounder in political wrangling, regulatory overlap, and staff resistance.

So, are we DOGE-ing it wrong? The lesson of 2025 is clear: true efficiency requires not just tech upgrades, but coherent, flexible regulation and a willingness to adapt. The dogged pursuit of efficiency must outlast one department, one administration, or one acronym.

Thanks for tuning in—make sure to subscribe for more insights. This has been a Quiet Please production, for more check out quietplease dot ai.

For more http://www.quietplease.ai

Get the best deals https://amzn.to/3ODvOta

This content was created in partnership and with the help of Artificial Intelligence AI