
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


This philosophical reflection challenges the popular phrase, “I do what it pleases me,” by exploring whether this attitude represents genuine liberty or merely a sophisticated form of selfishness. While acknowledging the Sartrean idea that we are fundamentally free to make our own choices, the text highlights the shadow of this freedom: the potential for one's pleasure to become another person’s burden. The author introduces the contrasting perspective of Kant, who suggests that true freedom involves doing what one ought to do out of respect for self and others, emphasizing that freedom without wisdom is just noise. Ultimately, the text argues that authentic freedom is achieved when pleasure is aligned with a deeper purpose and guided by conscience, transforming independence into a positive force.
By GerssonThis philosophical reflection challenges the popular phrase, “I do what it pleases me,” by exploring whether this attitude represents genuine liberty or merely a sophisticated form of selfishness. While acknowledging the Sartrean idea that we are fundamentally free to make our own choices, the text highlights the shadow of this freedom: the potential for one's pleasure to become another person’s burden. The author introduces the contrasting perspective of Kant, who suggests that true freedom involves doing what one ought to do out of respect for self and others, emphasizing that freedom without wisdom is just noise. Ultimately, the text argues that authentic freedom is achieved when pleasure is aligned with a deeper purpose and guided by conscience, transforming independence into a positive force.