
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


In microbial fermentation processes, particularly those involving Corynebacterium species for
secondary metabolite production, scale-up from laboratory to pilot volumes (300–500 L) often reveals
discrepancies that undermine commercial viability. In this instance, upstream fermentation consistently
achieved titers of 18–22 g/L, aligning with performance targets derived from smaller-scale (5–10 L)
experiments. However, downstream recovery faltered due to abrupt rheological changes in the broth
after approximately 72 hours of fermentation. Apparent viscosity surged 3–4-fold compared to lab
benchmarks, correlating with total suspended solids surpassing 18% w/v. This non-Newtonian, shearthinning
behavior—where viscosity decreases under shear stress but rebounds at rest—invalidated
equipment sizing assumptions, leading to operational failures.
By prasad ernalaIn microbial fermentation processes, particularly those involving Corynebacterium species for
secondary metabolite production, scale-up from laboratory to pilot volumes (300–500 L) often reveals
discrepancies that undermine commercial viability. In this instance, upstream fermentation consistently
achieved titers of 18–22 g/L, aligning with performance targets derived from smaller-scale (5–10 L)
experiments. However, downstream recovery faltered due to abrupt rheological changes in the broth
after approximately 72 hours of fermentation. Apparent viscosity surged 3–4-fold compared to lab
benchmarks, correlating with total suspended solids surpassing 18% w/v. This non-Newtonian, shearthinning
behavior—where viscosity decreases under shear stress but rebounds at rest—invalidated
equipment sizing assumptions, leading to operational failures.