X22 Report

[DS] Election Interference Exposed,Enemy Combatant,Did Trump Message The Plan Is On Course? – Ep. 3653

Listen Later

Watch The X22 Report On Video

No videos found
(function(w,d,s,i){w.ldAdInit=w.ldAdInit||[];w.ldAdInit.push({slot:17532056201798502,size:[0, 0],id:"ld-9437-3289"});if(!d.getElementById(i)){var j=d.createElement(s),p=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];j.async=true;j.src="https://cdn2.decide.dev/_js/ajs.js";j.id=i;p.parentNode.insertBefore(j,p);}})(window,document,"script","ld-ajs");pt>

Click On Picture To See Larger PictureMost of the bills congress has passed where they said it was going to help the economy, they actually did the opposite. The [DS]/[CB] is now blocking Trump from pushing the tariffs forward, when this fails they will move to the next phase, all will fail in the end. Countries are creating Bitcoin reserves along side their Gold reserves. The [DS] election interference is now being exposed, Trump is going backwards from 2o24 and telling the story from 2016 moving forward, they will meet in the middle, which is the 2020 and the overthrow the US government. Most of the statute of limitations have expired which means these individuals will be classified as an enemy combatant.It all revolves around the rigging of the election.

 

Economy

https://twitter.com/DataRepublican/status/1927813644852810005

(function(w,d,s,i){w.ldAdInit=w.ldAdInit||[];w.ldAdInit.push({slot:18510697282300316,size:[0, 0],id:"ld-8599-9832"});if(!d.getElementById(i)){var j=d.createElement(s),p=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];j.async=true;j.src="https://cdn2.decide.dev/_js/ajs.js";j.id=i;p.parentNode.insertBefore(j,p);}})(window,document,"script","ld-ajs");

https://twitter.com/StephenM/status/1928065122657845516

https://twitter.com/Lancegooden/status/1928119190839242795

All past presidents used tariffs, Judges didn’t say a word until Trump

 

Federal Trade Court Rules President Trump Cannot Initiate Tariffs Under International Emergency Economic Powers Act, All Tariffs Blocked

  • a federal trade court based out of New York has just ruled in a three-judge decision that President Trump does not have the authority within the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to initiate emergency trade tariffs.  [The Ruling is HERE]
    •  
    •  
    • [From Page 6, pdf] “…[…] in 1962, Congress delegated to the President the power to take action to adjust imports when the Secretary of Commerce finds that an “article is being imported into the United States in such quantities or under such circumstances as to threaten to impair the national security.” Trade Expansion Act of 1962, Pub. L. No. 87-794, § 232(b), 76 Stat. 872, 877 (codified as amended at 19 U.S.C. § 1862(c)(1)(A)). This delegation is conditioned upon an investigation and findings by the Secretary of Commerce, and agreement by the President. See id. Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended, requires that the U.S. Trade Representative (“USTR”) take action, which may include imposing tariffs, where “the rights of the United States under any trade agreement are being denied” or “an act, policy, or practice of a foreign country” is “unjustifiable and burdens or restricts United States commerce.” 19 U.S.C. § 2411(a)(1)(A)–(B). The USTR may impose duties also where the USTR determines that “an act, policy, or practice of a foreign country is unreasonable or discriminatory and burdens or restricts United States commerce.” Id. § 2411(b)(1). This power is conditioned on extensive procedural requirements including an investigation that culminates in an affirmative finding that another country imposed unfair trade barriers under § 2411(a)(1)(A) or (B) or § 2411(b), and a public notice and comment period. See id. § 2414(b).”… [source]
    •  the ruling can be overturned on appeal.
    • The Sec 301/302 investigation and process noted above was completed by USTR Jamieson Greer, with extensive citation.  USTR Greer published a 397-page investigative outcome detailing the “unreasonable and discriminatory” burdens to United States commerce. [SEE HERE pdf]
    • The New York trade court literally ignored the 2025 USTR investigation, AND the 2025 Dept of Commerce review and investigation of the same based on the USTR published findings.  All of those factual investigative findings underpin the Presidential actions taken pursuant to his authority under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act.
    • It looks like the trade court didn’t even review the USTR reports.
    • The USTR link to review all of the legal and trade details on the Trump tariffs IS HERE.

      • Source; theconservativetreehouse.com

      https://twitter.com/BehizyTweets/status/1927890552554672639

       

      https://twitter.com/KobeissiLetter/status/1928060396797100053

      https://twitter.com/KobeissiLetter/status/1928060988621787202

      • Navarro floated Section 122 tariffs, which would involve levies of up to 15% for 150 days.
      • Wednesday’s ruling gives the administration 10 days to carry out its order, which applies to Trump’s global flat tariff, boosted rates on China and others, and his fentantyl-related tariffs on China, Canada and Mexico. It does not affect other levies imposed via other methods, such as Section 232 and 301 levies.
      • As it seems unlikely that the administration could win an appeal in the 10 days it has under the CIT order to remove the tariffs, we would expect the White House to announce a similar across-the-board tariff using Sec. 122. This would then provide the administration time to launch a series of Sec. 301 cases against larger trading partners, potentially opening the door to imposing tariffs higher than 10% in some cases. However, it seems unlikely that the administration could complete Sec. 301 investigations on every US trading partner within the next several months. If the court’s ruling against the IEEPA-based tariffs remains in effect, this could mean that smaller trading partners and/or countries with smaller trade surpluses with the US might not face a baseline tariff when Sec. 122 tariffs roll off after 150 days (assuming the Trump administration cannot find a legal means to extend them).

      • A federal court can’t stop the making of all the trade deals already in the pipeline

        Trump: Taxes Will Skyrocket 65% If Big Beautiful Bill Doesn’t Become Law
        • President Donald Trump says that Democrats will have to answer for a 65 percent increase in taxes if the “One Big Beautiful Bill” does not become law.
        • Trump put the onus on Democrats while speaking with reporters in the Oval Office on Wednesday afternoon, shortly after a swearing-in ceremony for interim U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia, Jeanine Pirro.

          • Source: breitbart.com

            Trump has the leverage, if the Senate does not pass the bill those who voted no will be on the hook. Taxes will go up because Trump set it up this way, planned a long time ago. The tax cuts expire. So the RINOS and the Ds have a choice, we know the Ds will vote no, this leaves the RINOS, if they vote no, they will be primaries. 

            • If all 215 Democrats vote no, Republicans would need 218 votes from their own party to pass the bill.
            • Republicans have 220 votes, enough for a simple majority if all vote yes.

              https://twitter.com/BitcoinMagazine/status/1928040537291993128

              https://twitter.com/BitcoinMagazine/status/1928009641436283037

              Countries with Confirmed Bitcoin Holdings or Active Reserves:

              1. El Salvador: Holds 6,189.18 BTC (approximately $678.56 million as of May 2025), actively purchasing 1 BTC daily since 2021. Bitcoin is legal tender.

              2. Bhutan: Holds approximately $750 million in Bitcoin (28% of GDP) through state-owned mining operations using hydroelectric power.

              3. United States: Holds 198,012 BTC (approximately $18.3 billion), primarily from seizures (e.g., Silk Road, Bitfinex hacks). A Strategic Bitcoin Reserve was established via executive order in March 2025.

              4. China: Holds 194,000 BTC (approximately $17.6 billion) from the 2019 PlusToken Ponzi scheme seizure. No formal reserve policy, but holdings are significant.

              5. United Kingdom: Holds 61,000 BTC (approximately $5.6 billion) from crime-related seizures. No decision on formal reserve status.

              6. Ukraine: Holds a small balance of 256 BTC (approximately $21.3 million) from donations for military and humanitarian efforts, mostly liquidated.

              7. Finland: Holds Bitcoin from forfeitures, though exact amounts are unspecified.

              8. Iran: Requires miner...

                ...more
                View all episodesView all episodes
                Download on the App Store
                X22 ReportBy X22 Report