How can we describe reality without falling into paradox? E. E. Constance Jones tackled the nature of predication, redefining how we link subjects to properties. But did she solve the problem—or make it even deeper? AI-generated content. <hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>

How can we describe reality without falling into paradox? E. E. Constance Jones tackled the nature of predication, redefining how we link subjects to properties. But did she solve the problem—or make it even deeper? AI-generated content. Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

How can we describe reality without falling into paradox? E. E. Constance Jones tackled the nature of predication, redefining how we link subjects to properties. But did she solve the problem—or make it even deeper? AI-generated content. <p> Hosted on Acast. See <a href="https://acast.com/privacy" rel="noopener noreferrer">acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>

Share E. E. Constance Jones and the Paradox of Predication #1220

Sign up to save your podcasts

E. E. Constance Jones and the Paradox of Predication #1220

E. E. Constance Jones and the Paradox of Predication #1220

More shows like Philosophy

Philosophy Bites

Entitled Opinions (about Life and Literature)

The Ezra Klein Show