
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
现实和虚拟的边界在哪?我还能否相信被赋予的认同感,和被消费的爱?
一篇发表在《自然-通讯》上的研究表明:人每天会产生超过6000个”想法“(https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-17255-9)。你有没有想过,这些想法有多少是你自己产生的,又有多少是你所接收到信息赋予你的?
本期你会听到
倪湛舸
李天宇 大白
李天域 Jack
在这段对话中,我们从事实信念、虚构想象、宗教信仰这三种经常叠加在一起的”相信“是什么开始聊起,聊到了:宗教和科学控制人们认识世界的方式?商业、品牌、文化作品等如何通过“相信”来控制你的钱包、劳动、认知和爱?资本主义的新精神是什么?为什么情绪变成了商业追逐的新目标?我们在购买的到底是商品,还是某种想象?
节目的最后,倪教授探讨了修真小说所反映的中国人对于”升级“的痴迷可能是导致内卷的原因之一,以及虚构背后人们渴望善恶有报的愿景所具有的真实的力量。
结语
本期节目制作
TIANYU2FM的理念:每期对谈有价值的声音
主持人简介
扩展阅读(由倪湛舸教授提供)
关于模仿、宗教信仰、玄学
Kendall Walton, Mimesis as Make-Believe: On the Foundations of the Representational Arts
Neil Van Leeuwen, Religion as Make-Believe: A Theory of Belief, Imagination, and Group Identity
Theodor Adorno, The Stars Down to Earth
John and Jean Comaroff, “Ocuult Economies, Revisited”
Christopher Patridge, “Occulture and Everyday Enchantment”
关于创意资本主义
Brian Moeran and Timothy de Waal Malefyt ed., Magical Capitalism: Enchantment, Spells, and Occult Practices in Contemporary Economies
Guiseppe Cocco and Barbara Szaniecki ed., Creative Capitalism, Multitudinous Creativity: Radicalities and Alterities
关于小说、虚构性、历史小说
Gallagher, Catherine. "The Rise of Fictionality". The Novel, Volume 1: History, Geography, and Culture, edited by Franco Moretti, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2006, pp. 336-363.
Zeitlin, Judith T.. "Xiaoshuo". The Novel, Volume 1: History, Geography, and Culture, edited by Franco Moretti, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2006, pp. 249-261.
Saba Mahmood, “Azazeel and the Politics of Historical Fiction in Egypt,”Comparative Literature (2013) 65 (3): 265–284.
关于修真小说
Ni, Zhange. 2020. "Xiuzhen (Immortality Cultivation) Fantasy: Science, Religion, and the Novels of Magic/Superstition in Contemporary China" Religions 11, no. 1: 25.
Ni, Zhange. 2020. ““REIMAGINING DAOIST ALCHEMY, DECOLONIZING TRANSHUMANISM: THE FANTASY OF IMMORTALITY CULTIVATION IN TWENTY‐FIRST CENTURY CHINA”, Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science 55(3), 748–771
Feher, Michel. "Self-appreciation; or, the aspirations of human capital." Public Culture 21.1 (2009): 21-41.
现实和虚拟的边界在哪?我还能否相信被赋予的认同感,和被消费的爱?
一篇发表在《自然-通讯》上的研究表明:人每天会产生超过6000个”想法“(https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-17255-9)。你有没有想过,这些想法有多少是你自己产生的,又有多少是你所接收到信息赋予你的?
本期你会听到
倪湛舸
李天宇 大白
李天域 Jack
在这段对话中,我们从事实信念、虚构想象、宗教信仰这三种经常叠加在一起的”相信“是什么开始聊起,聊到了:宗教和科学控制人们认识世界的方式?商业、品牌、文化作品等如何通过“相信”来控制你的钱包、劳动、认知和爱?资本主义的新精神是什么?为什么情绪变成了商业追逐的新目标?我们在购买的到底是商品,还是某种想象?
节目的最后,倪教授探讨了修真小说所反映的中国人对于”升级“的痴迷可能是导致内卷的原因之一,以及虚构背后人们渴望善恶有报的愿景所具有的真实的力量。
结语
本期节目制作
TIANYU2FM的理念:每期对谈有价值的声音
主持人简介
扩展阅读(由倪湛舸教授提供)
关于模仿、宗教信仰、玄学
Kendall Walton, Mimesis as Make-Believe: On the Foundations of the Representational Arts
Neil Van Leeuwen, Religion as Make-Believe: A Theory of Belief, Imagination, and Group Identity
Theodor Adorno, The Stars Down to Earth
John and Jean Comaroff, “Ocuult Economies, Revisited”
Christopher Patridge, “Occulture and Everyday Enchantment”
关于创意资本主义
Brian Moeran and Timothy de Waal Malefyt ed., Magical Capitalism: Enchantment, Spells, and Occult Practices in Contemporary Economies
Guiseppe Cocco and Barbara Szaniecki ed., Creative Capitalism, Multitudinous Creativity: Radicalities and Alterities
关于小说、虚构性、历史小说
Gallagher, Catherine. "The Rise of Fictionality". The Novel, Volume 1: History, Geography, and Culture, edited by Franco Moretti, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2006, pp. 336-363.
Zeitlin, Judith T.. "Xiaoshuo". The Novel, Volume 1: History, Geography, and Culture, edited by Franco Moretti, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2006, pp. 249-261.
Saba Mahmood, “Azazeel and the Politics of Historical Fiction in Egypt,”Comparative Literature (2013) 65 (3): 265–284.
关于修真小说
Ni, Zhange. 2020. "Xiuzhen (Immortality Cultivation) Fantasy: Science, Religion, and the Novels of Magic/Superstition in Contemporary China" Religions 11, no. 1: 25.
Ni, Zhange. 2020. ““REIMAGINING DAOIST ALCHEMY, DECOLONIZING TRANSHUMANISM: THE FANTASY OF IMMORTALITY CULTIVATION IN TWENTY‐FIRST CENTURY CHINA”, Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science 55(3), 748–771
Feher, Michel. "Self-appreciation; or, the aspirations of human capital." Public Culture 21.1 (2009): 21-41.