After 5 years building SimpleDirect Financing from my university dorm to today, I'm shutting it down. 

This isn't about failure - it's about the brutal lessons every founder needs to learn about attachment, external dependencies, and why starting with principles beats chasing opportunities.

The real cost of founder attachment:

• Spent 5 years attached to one product idea from Waterloo sophomore year to now
• Watched brilliant founders waste 4-5 years on dead products simply because "it's their baby"
• Team sprints became customer feature requests instead of strategic roadmap
• Opportunity cost is massive - could have built transformative products during those years
• Product pivots became excuses to avoid admitting fundamental flaws

Fatal mistake #1: No end-to-end control:

• Integrated with 13 different lending partner APIs thinking sophistication = success
• Lost all control once customers hit partner experiences
• 99% of support tickets came from partner-side issues we couldn't fix
• One major partner changed commission structure overnight, broke our unit economics
• External API dependency = building on hope, not solid business foundation

Fatal mistake #2: Wrong customer-product fit:

• Assumed home improvement contractors wanted sophisticated web-based tools
• 70-80% actually preferred simple phone calls and text messages over complex apps
• Had customers using our product but they weren't really using what we built
• Problem-solution fit ≠ product-market fit when customers avoid your core features

Fatal mistake #3: Revenue model vulnerability:

• Commission-based model (1-2% per loan) seemed reasonable until partners cut rates 40-50%
• Revenue dependent on external partners' policies and goodwill
• No control over the money flowing into our business
• Unit economics collapsed overnight with zero recourse

The Basecamp lesson:

• $280M revenue, 60-70 employees, profitable 25+ years
• Start with principles, then build products - never the other way around
• Say no to thousands of customer requests that don't align with core values
• Built own calendar, messaging, project tools instead of integrating externally
• Actively fight feature bloat because complexity violates their principles

What I built wrong:

• Product first, principles later - created inevitable conflict with my values
• Added complexity to look sophisticated instead of solving customer problems
• Chased AI hype and market opportunities instead of aligned strengths
• Made decisions based on competition, not customer value
• Ignored what customers actually wanted (text messages) to build what sounded impressive (full app)

My new principle-first framework:

• Do I control the end-to-end customer experience?
• Does this align with our core values or just add unnecessary complexity?
• Are we building for customers or for ego?
• Is the revenue model sustainable without external dependencies?
• Are we selecting markets where we have unfair advantages?

Peter Thiel's brutal truth: When something goes wrong at startup beginning, it's impossible to fix later. Better to kill it and start fresh than spend years trying to patch fundamental flaws.

The path forward: Two new products launching built on these hard-learned principles. Sometimes the best business decision is knowing when to let go.

Red flags of founder attachment: Spending years on same product despite continuous issues, team roadmap becoming customer request backlog, justifying obvious problems instead of addressing root causes, chasing opportunities that don't align with strengths.

Bottom line: Don't let attachment blind you to reality. Build simple solutions for customers who prefer simplicity. Never base business success on external APIs or partners you don't control. Start with clear principles and build products that serve them - not the other way around.

New episodes Monday/Wednesday/Friday at 9am EST. Real founder lessons, not startup theater.

Daily thoughts: @TheGeorgePu on Twitter/X
Full episodes: founderreality.com
Email: [email protected]