E43 | 15 min | Latest | Publication Link
Podcast based on: Paratore, S.; Russo, A.; Lanzafame, K.; Blanco, G.; Giurato, E.; Bartoloni, G.; D’Asta, M.; Sapienza, M.; Bonanno, G.M.; Vallone, A.; Ettore, G.; Bordonaro, R. Prognostic Stratification of Multiple-Classifier Endometrial Cancers: Cohort Study and Meta-Analysis. Cancers 2026, 18, 929. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18060929
Type: Article | Publication date: 12 March 2026
Summary: The classification of endometrial cancer has evolved using molecular features, allowing for improved risk assessment and more personalized treatment strategies. However, a small proportion of tumors show more than one relevant molecular alteration, making their classification and clinical management more challenging. This study aimed to characterize molecular and clinicopathological profiles of multiple-classifier endometrial cancers, enhancing our understanding of their biological heterogeneity. In our patient cohort, POLEmut tumors with concurrent MMRd/MSI generally retained the POLE-associated ultramutated profile, while tumors with both MMRd/MSI and p53abn/TP53mut alterations were more often associated with more adverse clinicopathological characteristics compared to MMRd/MSI-only tumors. By integrating our data in a systematic literature review with meta-analysis, we observed that variability in reported incidence is largely driven by differences in testing strategies. These results highlight the limitations of current classification systems and emphasize the importance of more standardized molecular approaches to improve risk stratification and management in endometrial cancer.
Keywords: endometrial cancer; molecular profile; clinicopathological features; multiple-classifier; POLE mutated; mismatch repair-deficient; TP53mutated; next generation sequencingThis podcast provides a synthetically generated voice summary and discussion of scientific publications. The views expressed do not represent the views of the original authors, journals, or publishers. This podcast uses AI-assisted summaries, so it may or may not introduce inaccuracies or omit important details. Listeners are strongly encouraged to consult the original publications or sources for full context and accuracy. This podcast is for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute clinical advice, medical guidance, or recommendations. The creators of this podcast are not liable for any errors, omissions, or outcomes resulting from the use of the information provided.