Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
Share E7 Richard Syrett Interviews Pam Killeen About Red Dye #3
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Or
E7 Richard Syrett Interviews Pam Killeen About Red Dye #3
For more information visitwww.pamkilleen.com or www.truthoverspin.com
Recorded on January 28, 2025, Richard Syrett (Sauga 960AM) speaks with Pam Killeen about the recent ban of Red Dye #3 by the FDA and contrasts it with Health Canada's decision not to ban it. She explains the history of food dyes, their health implications, and the influence of lobbying on regulatory decisions. Killeen emphasizes the need for stricter regulations and accountability from Health Canada, highlighting the potential health risks associated with food additives and the importance of consumer protection.
Takeaways
- Red Dye #3 has been banned in the US due to health concerns.
- Health Canada has not banned Red Dye #3, citing low usage.
- The Delaney Clause in the US allows for stricter food safety regulations.
- Many food dyes are linked to behavioral issues in children.
- There are safer, natural alternatives to synthetic food dyes.
- Lobbying influences regulatory decisions in Canada.
- Health Canada has a history of inadequate regulation.
- Whistleblowers like Dr. Shiv Chopra highlight regulatory failures.
- Consumer protection should be prioritized over industry interests.
- The precautionary principle should guide food safety regulations.
Sound Bites
"These dyes are catalysts for erratic behaviors."
"They just want to make the lobbyists happy.
"Science is for sale."
Chapters
00:00 The Controversy of Red Dye Number 3
04:55 Health Canada's Stance and Lobbying Issues
Pam Killeen Resources
Websites --www.pamkilleen.com orwww.truthoverspin.comFacebook -- https://www.facebook.com/pam.killeen.9/
Instagram --https://www.instagram.com/circadianpam
YouTube -- http://www.youtube.com/pamkilleen
Rumble -- https://rumble.com/c/c-6784666
LinkedIn -- https://www.linkedin.com/in/pam-killeen-bab652218/
Substack --https://pamkilleen.substack.com/
X -https://x.com/PamKilleen
Disclaimer
The information on this podcast is for informationalpurposes only and is not intended as medical advice. We are not licensed healthcare providers, and our content is not a substitute for professional medical diagnosis, advice, or treatment.
For personalized health guidance or if you have specificmedical concerns, please consult a qualified medical professional. They can assess your individual health needs and offer recommendations tailored to you.
By listening to our podcast, you agree to this disclaimer.We assume no responsibility or liability for actions taken based on the information provided here.
Keywords: Red Dye Number 3, Health Canada, FDA, food safety, dietary supplements, lobbying, public health, food additives, consumer protection, health risks
View all episodes
By pamkilleen-caFor more information visitwww.pamkilleen.com or www.truthoverspin.com
Recorded on January 28, 2025, Richard Syrett (Sauga 960AM) speaks with Pam Killeen about the recent ban of Red Dye #3 by the FDA and contrasts it with Health Canada's decision not to ban it. She explains the history of food dyes, their health implications, and the influence of lobbying on regulatory decisions. Killeen emphasizes the need for stricter regulations and accountability from Health Canada, highlighting the potential health risks associated with food additives and the importance of consumer protection.
Takeaways
- Red Dye #3 has been banned in the US due to health concerns.
- Health Canada has not banned Red Dye #3, citing low usage.
- The Delaney Clause in the US allows for stricter food safety regulations.
- Many food dyes are linked to behavioral issues in children.
- There are safer, natural alternatives to synthetic food dyes.
- Lobbying influences regulatory decisions in Canada.
- Health Canada has a history of inadequate regulation.
- Whistleblowers like Dr. Shiv Chopra highlight regulatory failures.
- Consumer protection should be prioritized over industry interests.
- The precautionary principle should guide food safety regulations.
Sound Bites
"These dyes are catalysts for erratic behaviors."
"They just want to make the lobbyists happy.
"Science is for sale."
Chapters
00:00 The Controversy of Red Dye Number 3
04:55 Health Canada's Stance and Lobbying Issues
Pam Killeen Resources
Websites --www.pamkilleen.com orwww.truthoverspin.comFacebook -- https://www.facebook.com/pam.killeen.9/
Instagram --https://www.instagram.com/circadianpam
YouTube -- http://www.youtube.com/pamkilleen
Rumble -- https://rumble.com/c/c-6784666
LinkedIn -- https://www.linkedin.com/in/pam-killeen-bab652218/
Substack --https://pamkilleen.substack.com/
X -https://x.com/PamKilleen
Disclaimer
The information on this podcast is for informationalpurposes only and is not intended as medical advice. We are not licensed healthcare providers, and our content is not a substitute for professional medical diagnosis, advice, or treatment.
For personalized health guidance or if you have specificmedical concerns, please consult a qualified medical professional. They can assess your individual health needs and offer recommendations tailored to you.
By listening to our podcast, you agree to this disclaimer.We assume no responsibility or liability for actions taken based on the information provided here.
Keywords: Red Dye Number 3, Health Canada, FDA, food safety, dietary supplements, lobbying, public health, food additives, consumer protection, health risks