In this episode of EMERGENT, I speak with former USAF security officer Jeffrey Nuccetelli about the five UAP incursions at Vandenberg Air Force Base between 2003 and 2005 and how they fit into a broader pattern of UAP activity at missile test ranges and during the deployment of new space-based sensing technologies. We look at indicators of intelligent behavior, possible scenarios of intent, and what these events may signal about the changing conditions around us.

Our conversation also touches on the growing role of lawful whistleblowers and the challenges they face when bringing forward information related to crash retrieval programs, reverse engineering efforts, and space-based observations. Through these cases, we examine why the public picture of UAP remains incomplete—and why reality still feels classified.

Part 2 (After Hours) will explore the deeper structure of secrecy surrounding these events and will be available in the following places:

~YouTube Members: https://youtu.be/suFLER_LkpM

~Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/ReedSummers

~Forerunner: https://www.reedsummers.com/forerunner/ (to be released on December 26th, 2025)

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

I'll be hosting a roundtable with investigative journalists Matt Ford and Chris Sharp.

We’ll explore what they uncovered earlier this year in their Daily Mail exposé which went along way to describing in detail the machinations of the "Age of Cover-Up” we've been living in. Read the article here: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...

I'll also examine the developments since—including recent Congressional hearings, provocative statements by Rep. Eric Burlison and the Declassification Office and the attempt to submit "interrogatives" demanding information regarding UAP from federal agencies.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

In this episode, I react to the new Age of Disclosure documentary and highlight its most notable claims about humanity’s evolving relationship with non-human intelligence (NHI). I cover the film’s accounts of the 1964 Holloman AFB landing, reported Soviet crash retrievals, and testimony about a directed-energy weapon recovered during a U.S. operation.

I also examine how secrecy structures, plausible deniability, and the refusal to address origin have shaped the NHI narrative, why congressional transparency continues to stall, and what this moment means for public agency as institutions struggle to adjust.

Key topics include:

• Holloman landing accounts

• International crash-retrieval testimony

• Non-human biological specimen claims

• Directed-energy weapon recovery

• Plausible deniability and origin

• Congressional bottlenecks and secrecy

• The shift from UAP to NHI

• Public agency in the disclosure era

A concise look at what the documentary contributes to the disclosure timeline and what it may indicate about the path ahead.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

In this episode of EMERGENT, I sit down with Dr. Michael Cifone to examine what it will take to build a real science of non-human intelligence. We look at why traditional ufology has stalled, how eyewitness testimony should inform next-generation detection systems, and what it means to study the mind behind UAP—not just the objects.

In this episode, we explore:

• Why UAP evidence demands new scientific standards

• The forensic epistemic loop that stalled 80 years of inquiry

• How phenomenology and experience guide better instrumentation

• The challenge of studying intelligence without anthropomorphism

• The “relational event space” of human–non-human interaction

• Why slow, methodical, institutional groundwork is essential

If we want to understand NHI, we must build the science capable of perceiving it.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Are we truly entering the Age of Disclosure—or merely exiting the Age of Coverup without a clear vision, roadmap or sense of end in mind? What are we seeking to have disclosed, and what are the implications of those immense revelations for the public, and for humanity at large?

In this episode of Frontlines, Reed Summers examines the volatile threshold of disclosure—the rising public awareness of non-human intelligence and the fragile, halting advances of government acknowledgment.

As certain figures step forward while others retreat, as confusion spreads about the nature of “entities” and their possible origins and intentions, and as government confirmation takes one step forward and two steps back, its time to discuss the road ahead—the disclosure roadmap.

Here we must acknowledge the unknowns—but we must also begin defining the ends. Because without a clearly articulated end goal, someone else—likely operating with very different aims—will define disclosure for us.

We are exiting an era of structured secrecy and stepping into an arena of radical uncertainty. Instead of wishful thinking and belief this threshold demands strategy, clarity, and a basis for collective response.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

n this episode of EMERGENT, host Reed Summers is joined by Ted Roe—founding member of UAP Medical Coalition (UAPmed) and longtime advocate for experiencer-centered research within the UAP/NHI discourse. This conversation explores the emerging intersection of scientific inquiry, human experience, and the philosophical stakes of potential contact with non-human intelligence.

This episode spotlights the launch of a vital new public initiative:

👉 Investigating Non-Human Intelligence

—a groundbreaking lecture and panel series designed to bring clarity, rigor, and open inquiry to the evolving conversation around NHI.

The Investigating Non-Human Intelligence series begins with lectures by Dr. Michael Cifone, who outlines a rigorous philosophy of science approach to studying anomalous claims, and Dr. Garry Nolan, who presents a research roadmap for biologically and technologically analyzing potential non-human interactions.

From foundational questions of evidence and method, to the lived experience of contact and its implications for science, medicine, and public discourse, Reed and Ted discuss:

The importance of delineating an ETI—extraterrestrial intelligence—within the larger discourse on NHI—non-human intelligence

Why mainstream science has struggled to confront this reality

The risk of excluding first-hand data from the scientific method

How medicine, psychology, and philosophy must evolve to meet the challenge of our human encounter with non-human realities

The difference between non-human observation and non-human engagement—and why that matters

Why interdisciplinary frameworks are urgently needed to decode the phenomenon

Whether you're a scientist, experiencer, decision maker, or simply curious, this is an essential conversation on how we prepare—not just to understand—but to respond.

https://humaninstitute.org/investigating-non-human-intelligence/

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

In this episode of EMERGENT, we break down the anatomy of UAP disclosure—from congressional hearings to citizen advocacy, from whistleblower testimony to government stonewalling—and, most importantly, the societal, psychological, and spiritual implications of a world learning the truth.

If we’re learning anything, it’s that disclosure won’t arrive with a single podium moment. It will come in waves—a series of jolts and a hard reckoning—for governments, institutions, and ultimately, for all of humanity.

After speaking at the October 19th Global Disclosure Day (link to full video), I will give my behind-the-scenes examination of the current state of UAP disclosure, the unstable momentum behind it, and the consequences of crossing the threshold—from secrecy, to acknowledgment, to direct engagement with a greater reality.

What would it mean for humanity to formally acknowledge a non-human intelligence operating within our world?

What information would be brought to light—and what might still be withheld?

And how can we begin to evaluate the intentions of this intelligence itself—whether it welcomes disclosure, or is strategically working against it?

In this episode, I’ll be covering:

• Why 2026 may be the tipping point year on Disclosure of NHI

• The four forces shaping disclosure (and why NHI may be one of them)

• What’s actually being disclosed—and what remains intentionally unsaid

• The psychological and spiritual implications of public acknowledgment

• How individuals and the international community need to be preparing for a post-disclosure world

Ultimately, this isn’t just about understanding them—the phenomenon of non-human intelligence. It’s about us. It’s about how humanity responds to the revelation of a non-human presence operating within our world. Let’s examine that path forward.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

In this episode of Emergent, we discuss an intelligence briefing at the edge of what may be the most consequential event in human history: humanity’s ongoing engagement with non-human intelligence.

This interactive broadcast is created for Forerunners—citizens, researchers, and strategic thinkers—working to decode the nature of this presence, its intent, and what a real human response might look like.

Key segments include:

• Breaking Down New Signals – Recent developments in the UAP/NHI space.
• Introducing the Human Institute – A first look at a new organization shaping humanity’s strategic response.
• Framing the Global Stakes – From national security to human security, exploring what’s truly at risk.

The conversation also examines foundational questions:

• What is the intelligence behind UAP?
• What does their activity indicate about intent?
• Does a long-term presence imply a stake in our future?
• And what does it mean to respond not just in the national interest, but in the human interest?

Featuring live polls, Q&A, and real-time contributions from the audience—subscribe and tune in for a livewire exploration at the intersection of public intelligence, strategic insight, and human response-ability.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

In this conversation, we explore what can be learned from direct, on-the-ground observations in remote areas with UAP researcher Rony Vernet.

We'll be addressing these important questions: 

- How are UAP active in these rural and remote areas where our observing capabilities are limited?

- How are these anomalous craft interacting with people on the ground?

- How does this interaction connect to historic instances of close approaches and potentially aggressive engagements?

- Are there new patterns and trends today that could reveal the motives and intentions behind this phenomenon?

Rony brings his unique expertise, blending scientific analysis with firsthand fieldwork among rural and indigenous communities.

Together, we’ll examine sightings of mysterious craft and orb phenomena, uncovering insights that could change how we understand what is happening now—and what it means for our future.

Images of his work: https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1pluDzBXsU_WbGnZ4TsSj0PfO3DU5zXL-

https://x.com/RonyVernet

https://www.youtube.com/ronyvernet

https://uapbrazil.com/

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

With the September 9th congressional hearings on UAP/UFOs just days away, I had a timely interview with Daniel (“Danny”) Sheehan—a seasoned constitutional and public-interest attorney involved in disclosure and efforts to promote government transparency around UFOs.

Why this matters now:

Needed context before the congressional hearings: What’s really on the table for the September 9th hearings and the UAP Disclosure Act, newly submitted in the Senate, and what outcomes are possible?

A lens on law & policy: What Congress can do next—and what the public should push for.

The interplay of government and potential NHI secrecies: How to assess the state of secrecy in both its human and non-human origins.

What you can do: Concrete steps for informed civic engagement in the days ahead.

About my guest:

Daniel Sheehan is a constitutional and public-interest attorney who has helped lead multiple lawsuits of historic importance, including three Supreme Court cases, the Iran-Contra Lawsuit, the Three Mile Island litigation, and the first Sanctuary defense case. He is the director of the New Paradigm Institute and is the author of The People’s Advocate.

https://newparadigminstitute.org/

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.