What counts as good evidence — and how do you actually score it?

Ben de la Fontaine (research scientist, methodology lead at UFOEvidence.com) joins to walk through the UFOE scoring system live, applied to two newly government-released cases: Apollo 17 transcripts and the Aegean Sea Reaper drone incident — which maxed out the scale at a perfect 5.

We also live-scored a third case with the audience, took Q&A, and got into what citizens should be doing right now to claim agency in the disclosure process rather than waiting on governments to tell us what's real.

Join the UFOEvidence.com community and keep the conversation going on Discord — links below.

+ UFOEvidence.com

+ Join the UFOevidence community on Discord: https://discord.com/invite/a6R2NDMz5

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

I speak with Rod Burley about the state of UFO evidence and the problem of fragmented standards. We examine why the public conversation so often outruns the actual evidentiary basis.

We also discuss the framework behind UFOevidence.com and what it is designed to clarify.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Reed Summers speaks with former special operations leader and technologist James Fowler about the evolving landscape of air intelligence and airspace security and the 11 types of UAP detected.

Drawing on more than two decades of experience across advanced sensing systems, electronic warfare, and aviation technology, Fowler examines how drone proliferation, GPS vulnerability, and vision-based navigation are reshaping how airspace is monitored and protected worldwide. The discussion focuses on technical limitations, systemic blind spots, and why many legacy assumptions no longer hold in a complex, interconnected air environment.

This episode sets the foundation for understanding airspace security as a global challenge—one that cuts across defense, aviation, infrastructure, and emerging technology—rather than a narrow, nation-specific concern.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

What is the hidden geopolitics behind the so-called “Age of Cover-Up”? In this episode of Emergent, host Reed Summers speaks with former intelligence officer and researcher Geoff Cruickshank to examine how Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAP) became embedded within Cold War national security frameworks.

For over 80 years, a parallel history has existed alongside the official record. Moving beyond sightings and speculation, this conversation analyzes why information related to UAPs has been tightly controlled by military and intelligence institutions—and how nuclear weapons, space policy, and geopolitical power shaped that secrecy.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

In this episode of EMERGENT, I speak with former USAF security officer Jeffrey Nuccetelli about the five UAP incursions at Vandenberg Air Force Base between 2003 and 2005 and how they fit into a broader pattern of UAP activity at missile test ranges and during the deployment of new space-based sensing technologies. We look at indicators of intelligent behavior, possible scenarios of intent, and what these events may signal about the changing conditions around us.

Our conversation also touches on the growing role of lawful whistleblowers and the challenges they face when bringing forward information related to crash retrieval programs, reverse engineering efforts, and space-based observations. Through these cases, we examine why the public picture of UAP remains incomplete—and why reality still feels classified.

Part 2 (After Hours) will explore the deeper structure of secrecy surrounding these events and will be available in the following places:

~YouTube Members: https://youtu.be/suFLER_LkpM

~Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/ReedSummers

~Forerunner: https://www.reedsummers.com/forerunner/ (to be released on December 26th, 2025)

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

I'll be hosting a roundtable with investigative journalists Matt Ford and Chris Sharp.

We’ll explore what they uncovered earlier this year in their Daily Mail exposé which went along way to describing in detail the machinations of the "Age of Cover-Up” we've been living in. Read the article here: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...

I'll also examine the developments since—including recent Congressional hearings, provocative statements by Rep. Eric Burlison and the Declassification Office and the attempt to submit "interrogatives" demanding information regarding UAP from federal agencies.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

In this episode, I react to the new Age of Disclosure documentary and highlight its most notable claims about humanity’s evolving relationship with non-human intelligence (NHI). I cover the film’s accounts of the 1964 Holloman AFB landing, reported Soviet crash retrievals, and testimony about a directed-energy weapon recovered during a U.S. operation.

I also examine how secrecy structures, plausible deniability, and the refusal to address origin have shaped the NHI narrative, why congressional transparency continues to stall, and what this moment means for public agency as institutions struggle to adjust.

Key topics include:

• Holloman landing accounts

• International crash-retrieval testimony

• Non-human biological specimen claims

• Directed-energy weapon recovery

• Plausible deniability and origin

• Congressional bottlenecks and secrecy

• The shift from UAP to NHI

• Public agency in the disclosure era

A concise look at what the documentary contributes to the disclosure timeline and what it may indicate about the path ahead.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

In this episode of EMERGENT, I sit down with Dr. Michael Cifone to examine what it will take to build a real science of non-human intelligence. We look at why traditional ufology has stalled, how eyewitness testimony should inform next-generation detection systems, and what it means to study the mind behind UAP—not just the objects.

In this episode, we explore:

• Why UAP evidence demands new scientific standards

• The forensic epistemic loop that stalled 80 years of inquiry

• How phenomenology and experience guide better instrumentation

• The challenge of studying intelligence without anthropomorphism

• The “relational event space” of human–non-human interaction

• Why slow, methodical, institutional groundwork is essential

If we want to understand NHI, we must build the science capable of perceiving it.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Are we truly entering the Age of Disclosure—or merely exiting the Age of Coverup without a clear vision, roadmap or sense of end in mind? What are we seeking to have disclosed, and what are the implications of those immense revelations for the public, and for humanity at large?

In this episode of Frontlines, Reed Summers examines the volatile threshold of disclosure—the rising public awareness of non-human intelligence and the fragile, halting advances of government acknowledgment.

As certain figures step forward while others retreat, as confusion spreads about the nature of “entities” and their possible origins and intentions, and as government confirmation takes one step forward and two steps back, its time to discuss the road ahead—the disclosure roadmap.

Here we must acknowledge the unknowns—but we must also begin defining the ends. Because without a clearly articulated end goal, someone else—likely operating with very different aims—will define disclosure for us.

We are exiting an era of structured secrecy and stepping into an arena of radical uncertainty. Instead of wishful thinking and belief this threshold demands strategy, clarity, and a basis for collective response.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

n this episode of EMERGENT, host Reed Summers is joined by Ted Roe—founding member of UAP Medical Coalition (UAPmed) and longtime advocate for experiencer-centered research within the UAP/NHI discourse. This conversation explores the emerging intersection of scientific inquiry, human experience, and the philosophical stakes of potential contact with non-human intelligence.

This episode spotlights the launch of a vital new public initiative:

👉 Investigating Non-Human Intelligence

—a groundbreaking lecture and panel series designed to bring clarity, rigor, and open inquiry to the evolving conversation around NHI.

The Investigating Non-Human Intelligence series begins with lectures by Dr. Michael Cifone, who outlines a rigorous philosophy of science approach to studying anomalous claims, and Dr. Garry Nolan, who presents a research roadmap for biologically and technologically analyzing potential non-human interactions.

From foundational questions of evidence and method, to the lived experience of contact and its implications for science, medicine, and public discourse, Reed and Ted discuss:

The importance of delineating an ETI—extraterrestrial intelligence—within the larger discourse on NHI—non-human intelligence

Why mainstream science has struggled to confront this reality

The risk of excluding first-hand data from the scientific method

How medicine, psychology, and philosophy must evolve to meet the challenge of our human encounter with non-human realities

The difference between non-human observation and non-human engagement—and why that matters

Why interdisciplinary frameworks are urgently needed to decode the phenomenon

Whether you're a scientist, experiencer, decision maker, or simply curious, this is an essential conversation on how we prepare—not just to understand—but to respond.

https://humaninstitute.org/investigating-non-human-intelligence/

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.