As the calendar races toward March 1, the Iran nuclear standoff is no longer just rhetoric — it’s a tightening set of red lines, deadlines, and military posture. In this episode of Threat and Theory, Howard breaks down why crises often don’t ignite when missiles launch, but when leaders misread each other’s thresholds. We unpack Iran’s “nuclear only” stance, Washington’s push for “zero enrichment,” and Israel’s view of missile capability as an existential threat — all while major U.S. air and naval assets move into position. From 60% enriched uranium and leverage calculations to what “procedural escalation” looks like in real time, this is a guided look at how diplomacy can quietly become the runway to conflict.

Topics include: Iran’s enrichment posture, missiles as deterrence, carrier strike group signaling, AWACS/ISR pressure, regime survival dynamics, and the key indicators to watch as March 1 approaches.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.