Today, the Intrepid team circles back to anti-terrorism peace bonds as a Canadian anti-terrorism tool because of a new case, R. v. Ibrahim.  Released last week, this is the first anti-terror peace bond to be contested on its merits -- and the government lost. Stephanie and Craig discuss how peace bonds work, their pros and cons, and what exactly happened in this case, and what it might mean.

Today, the Intrepid team circles back to anti-terrorism peace bonds as a Canadian anti-terrorism tool because of a new case, R. v. Ibrahim. Released last week, this is the first anti-terror peace bond to be contested on its merits -- and the government lost. Stephanie and Craig discuss how peace bonds work, their pros and cons, and what exactly happened in this case, and what it might mean.

Ep 22 Anti-Terror Peace Bonds Have Their Day in Court

In &quot;A podcast Called INTREPID&quot;, Stephanie Carvin (NPSIA, Carleton University) and Craig Forcese (Faculty of Law, uOttawa) discuss and debate issues in Canadian national security law and policy, sometimes ripped from the headlines, and in other instances, just because they seem interesting.

Education

In "A podcast Called INTREPID", Stephanie Carvin (NPSIA, Carleton University) and Craig Forcese (Faculty of Law, uOttawa) discuss and debate issues in Canadian national security law and policy, sometimes ripped from the headlines, and in other instances, just because they seem interesting.

Share Ep 22 Anti-Terror Peace Bonds Have Their Day in Court

Sign up to save your podcasts

Ep 22 Anti-Terror Peace Bonds Have Their Day in Court

Ep 22 Anti-Terror Peace Bonds Have Their Day in Court