
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
Welcome to Simpler Bible, your daily path to biblical understanding.
What's in Store: Daily podcasts, YouTube videos, and blog posts – everything you need to make your Bible study a breeze, no matter where you are on your faith journey.
Connect with Us:
Don't Miss Out: Hit subscribe for a daily dose of Bible wisdom. Let's explore the Scriptures together, connect the dots, and uncover the major themes of redemption.
Join us in making Bible study Simpler!
Here’s an excerpt from the blog post.
The Jews all historically accepted Melchizedek as a priest of God, a King, and a foreshadowing of the coming Messiah. In the Jewish culture, there was not a single king who served as a priest; there was no priest who served as a king. (Though that would be prophesied in the book of Zechariah) The reason this all matters is simple. If Melchizedek had not existed and had not been so revered by the Jews, then there would be no precedent to accept a Messiah as both priest AND king. The Jews would be able to accept the premise of a king arising from a tribe other than Levi because Melchizedek himself was a priest who did not come from the tribe of Levi. The Jews would be able to accept Jesus as both a priest AND king because the Messiah was "like" Melchizedek. If that is not cool enough, we gain insight into the person and character of Jesus when we compare him to the name and purpose of Melchizedek because Jesus is also, by nature, King of Righteousness, and he also became (for us) King of Peace. Melchizedek then sets the stage for the Messiah to be unique. Christ would come to be both priest and king.
Don't miss the significance of, "If perfection had been attainable through the Levitical priesthood, what further need would there have been for another priest to arise after the order of Melchizedek, rather than one named after the order of Aaron? For where there is a change in the priesthood, there is necessarily a change in the law as well." The Aaronic priesthood was set in place according to the law of Moses, but the priesthood of Jesus is established by better blood, on better promises, for a better covenant, namely grace. We have to quit teaching Christians that the Law of Moses is the metric of righteousness and begin proclaiming the righteousness that only comes by faith.
For more visit http://simplerbible.com/episodes
5
2424 ratings
Welcome to Simpler Bible, your daily path to biblical understanding.
What's in Store: Daily podcasts, YouTube videos, and blog posts – everything you need to make your Bible study a breeze, no matter where you are on your faith journey.
Connect with Us:
Don't Miss Out: Hit subscribe for a daily dose of Bible wisdom. Let's explore the Scriptures together, connect the dots, and uncover the major themes of redemption.
Join us in making Bible study Simpler!
Here’s an excerpt from the blog post.
The Jews all historically accepted Melchizedek as a priest of God, a King, and a foreshadowing of the coming Messiah. In the Jewish culture, there was not a single king who served as a priest; there was no priest who served as a king. (Though that would be prophesied in the book of Zechariah) The reason this all matters is simple. If Melchizedek had not existed and had not been so revered by the Jews, then there would be no precedent to accept a Messiah as both priest AND king. The Jews would be able to accept the premise of a king arising from a tribe other than Levi because Melchizedek himself was a priest who did not come from the tribe of Levi. The Jews would be able to accept Jesus as both a priest AND king because the Messiah was "like" Melchizedek. If that is not cool enough, we gain insight into the person and character of Jesus when we compare him to the name and purpose of Melchizedek because Jesus is also, by nature, King of Righteousness, and he also became (for us) King of Peace. Melchizedek then sets the stage for the Messiah to be unique. Christ would come to be both priest and king.
Don't miss the significance of, "If perfection had been attainable through the Levitical priesthood, what further need would there have been for another priest to arise after the order of Melchizedek, rather than one named after the order of Aaron? For where there is a change in the priesthood, there is necessarily a change in the law as well." The Aaronic priesthood was set in place according to the law of Moses, but the priesthood of Jesus is established by better blood, on better promises, for a better covenant, namely grace. We have to quit teaching Christians that the Law of Moses is the metric of righteousness and begin proclaiming the righteousness that only comes by faith.
For more visit http://simplerbible.com/episodes
824 Listeners
153,400 Listeners
18,948 Listeners
5,248 Listeners
17 Listeners
3,130 Listeners
27,926 Listeners
24,532 Listeners
49,279 Listeners
42,647 Listeners
47 Listeners
38,500 Listeners
351 Listeners
15,357 Listeners
547 Listeners