In this episode of The Whole Lawyer, Akeem and Tonée Earle break down the truth about squatters rights, adverse possession, and the controversial case of Tameika Good. After reports surfaced about a woman occupying a vacant bank owned property, social media erupted with debates about property law, housing insecurity, and whether “squatters rights” are real.

Here’s the reality: there is no such thing as squatters rights in the way the internet describes it.

We explain what adverse possession actually is, the strict legal requirements that must be met, and why most people completely misunderstand how property ownership works. If you have ever wondered whether someone can legally take over a vacant home, how long it takes, or what happens when a bank owns the property, this episode breaks it down in plain English.

We also explore the ethical questions behind squatting. Is it survival? Is it theft? Is it a failure of the housing system? And how should communities respond to vacant properties?

Then we shift to a powerful conversation about pro se litigation and whether representing yourself in court is ever a smart move. We discuss when legal representation is essential, when self representation might make sense, and why understanding your legal rights is critical in today’s system.

This episode covers:

• Squatters rights explained
• Adverse possession requirements
• The Tameika Good case
• Property law basics
• Legal ethics and social justice
• Pro se litigation risks and benefits
• Community reactions to vacant homes

If you care about property ownership, housing insecurity, legal reform, or simply understanding how the law really works, this is a conversation you do not want to miss.

Listen now and share with someone who thinks squatters rights means you can just move into a house.

#TheWholeLawyer #PropertyLaw #AdversePossession #SquattersRights #LegalEducation