Controversy sells. Being wildly specific is catchy and makes it look like you know what you're talking about, no matter how outrageous the claim. I find the most extreme information spreaders are the most popular, and it's annoying. But it's most annoying in that it's not sustainable for the people they're "trying" to help. (By "trying" I mean sell their supplements blood tests or books to.)

I almost left the fitness and nutrition (wellness as a whole basically) online world for good, I was done. But what I found was that I needed to be treating my business as I treat my clients...with REAL Expectations. I approach clients with reality in mind and I needed to shift that for myself as well. Did that change anything for you, the listeners, or my clients? nope. I have seen such positive change in people from learning to be a bit more flexible and less rigid that I decided to make that part of my coaching philosophy.

I am a science-based fitness and nutrition coach and I have always based my advice and programming on things that are proven. But there are things that are proven, or on-their-way-to-being-proven, that simply don't work for every person. I give examples, like water..it can be killer, but would I ever tell you to stop drinking it? I would be a crappy coach if I did.

Take a listen, I'd love for you to see how I shift my approach as life changes for me and as my clients needs and goals change. Why I am not "anti-extreme" measures but how I lived that way and learned from it as a coach.