
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


In this member episode of Learning Out Loud, Dustin William and Whitestone walk through Equity Maxim Five — He Who Seeks Equity Must Do Equity — and show how the principle operates in real litigation: equity will grant relief only on the condition that corresponding equitable rights are recognized on the other side. Along the way, they connect the maxim to the clean hands doctrine (and its limits), clarify what a court-appointed receiver is (and what a receiver cannot do), and define laches as “delay that works disadvantage,” not mere passage of time. The discussion then anchors the maxim in Supreme Court applications across Brown v. Lake Superior Iron Co. (1890), Manufacturers Finance Co. v. McKee (1935), and Johnson v. Yellow Cab Transit Co. (1944), tracing how equity language becomes increasingly obscured over time—yet the principles remain.
Visit truelifeproduction.com to access the full library, transcripts, and interactive show notes.
By learningoutloudpodcastIn this member episode of Learning Out Loud, Dustin William and Whitestone walk through Equity Maxim Five — He Who Seeks Equity Must Do Equity — and show how the principle operates in real litigation: equity will grant relief only on the condition that corresponding equitable rights are recognized on the other side. Along the way, they connect the maxim to the clean hands doctrine (and its limits), clarify what a court-appointed receiver is (and what a receiver cannot do), and define laches as “delay that works disadvantage,” not mere passage of time. The discussion then anchors the maxim in Supreme Court applications across Brown v. Lake Superior Iron Co. (1890), Manufacturers Finance Co. v. McKee (1935), and Johnson v. Yellow Cab Transit Co. (1944), tracing how equity language becomes increasingly obscured over time—yet the principles remain.
Visit truelifeproduction.com to access the full library, transcripts, and interactive show notes.