Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
Share EP 70 Matt Grant Part 2
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Or
EP 70 Matt Grant Part 2
EPISODE 70: Matt Grant Interview Part 2 - Fighting Family Court Corruption
Welcome back to the JudgeMental Podcast! In this follow-up to Episode 17, we reconnect with Matt Grant, a decorated attorney and former equity partner at one of the nation's largest law firms, who is now fighting corruption in Missouri's family court system as a litigant in his own case.
ABOUT THIS EPISODE
Matt Grant returns to share updates on his groundbreaking RICO and Civil Rights Act lawsuit filed against family court actors in Missouri. With over 25 years of litigation experience, Matt brings a unique perspective as both a highly skilled attorney and a parent navigating the family court system.
KEY TOPICS DISCUSSED
• The RICO Lawsuit: Matt's federal case alleging a criminal enterprise within Missouri's family court system, including judges, guardians ad litem (GALs), and attorneys who allegedly prolong litigation for financial gain
• Putting a Judge on the Stand: The extraordinary circumstances that allowed Matt to question Judge Bruce F. Hilton under oath about his actions in Matt's family court case
• The "Buying Future Litigation" Email: Evidence Matt uncovered showing explicit discussions about intentionally prolonging cases for profit
• Guardian ad Litem as Fall Guys: Why Matt believes GALs will be the first thrown under the bus as the corruption unravels
• Retaliation and Judicial Bias: How Matt's custody time was reduced to 4 nights per month after exposing corruption, then increased to 8 nights after filing the RICO suit
• Ex Parte Communications: Evidence of improper communications between the judge and parties, including suspicious timing of discovery orders
• The Pattern of Corruption: How the system operates with specific playbooks to maximize conflict and legal fees in cases with the "right" combination of corrupt actors
• Sealed Records and Transparency: The ongoing battle to keep federal court filings public and accessible
• Historical Evidence: Matt's discovery of potential money laundering dating back to 1998 and questionable nonprofit organizations
CONNECT WITH US
🌐 Visit our website: judge-y.com
📱 Follow us on social media: @Judgingthejudges
LEARN MORE ABOUT MATT'S CASE
Visit stopmissouricorruption.com to access court filings, recordings, and updates on Matt's federal RICO case.
COMING UP
Stay tuned for Part 3 of our conversation with Matt Grant, where we'll dive deeper into:
The federal court's attempts to seal his pleadings
Why family court proceedings are systematically sealed
The constitutional right to public access to court records
Updates on his appeal and ongoing litigation
LEGAL DISCLAIMER
The content of this podcast is for informational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended to be, and should not be construed as, legal advice. Engaging with this content does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and the hosts, guests, or their firms. The views and opinions expressed on this podcast are solely those of the individuals involved and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of any law firm, company, or organization. We make no representations or warranties regarding the accuracy, completeness, or applicability of the information presented. Any reliance on the information in this podcast is at your own risk. Laws are constantly changing, and every situation is unique. You should always seek the advice of a qualified attorney for your specific legal concerns.
View all episodes
By Christine Miller, Hugh BarrowEPISODE 70: Matt Grant Interview Part 2 - Fighting Family Court Corruption
Welcome back to the JudgeMental Podcast! In this follow-up to Episode 17, we reconnect with Matt Grant, a decorated attorney and former equity partner at one of the nation's largest law firms, who is now fighting corruption in Missouri's family court system as a litigant in his own case.
ABOUT THIS EPISODE
Matt Grant returns to share updates on his groundbreaking RICO and Civil Rights Act lawsuit filed against family court actors in Missouri. With over 25 years of litigation experience, Matt brings a unique perspective as both a highly skilled attorney and a parent navigating the family court system.
KEY TOPICS DISCUSSED
• The RICO Lawsuit: Matt's federal case alleging a criminal enterprise within Missouri's family court system, including judges, guardians ad litem (GALs), and attorneys who allegedly prolong litigation for financial gain
• Putting a Judge on the Stand: The extraordinary circumstances that allowed Matt to question Judge Bruce F. Hilton under oath about his actions in Matt's family court case
• The "Buying Future Litigation" Email: Evidence Matt uncovered showing explicit discussions about intentionally prolonging cases for profit
• Guardian ad Litem as Fall Guys: Why Matt believes GALs will be the first thrown under the bus as the corruption unravels
• Retaliation and Judicial Bias: How Matt's custody time was reduced to 4 nights per month after exposing corruption, then increased to 8 nights after filing the RICO suit
• Ex Parte Communications: Evidence of improper communications between the judge and parties, including suspicious timing of discovery orders
• The Pattern of Corruption: How the system operates with specific playbooks to maximize conflict and legal fees in cases with the "right" combination of corrupt actors
• Sealed Records and Transparency: The ongoing battle to keep federal court filings public and accessible
• Historical Evidence: Matt's discovery of potential money laundering dating back to 1998 and questionable nonprofit organizations
CONNECT WITH US
🌐 Visit our website: judge-y.com
📱 Follow us on social media: @Judgingthejudges
LEARN MORE ABOUT MATT'S CASE
Visit stopmissouricorruption.com to access court filings, recordings, and updates on Matt's federal RICO case.
COMING UP
Stay tuned for Part 3 of our conversation with Matt Grant, where we'll dive deeper into:
The federal court's attempts to seal his pleadings
Why family court proceedings are systematically sealed
The constitutional right to public access to court records
Updates on his appeal and ongoing litigation
LEGAL DISCLAIMER
The content of this podcast is for informational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended to be, and should not be construed as, legal advice. Engaging with this content does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and the hosts, guests, or their firms. The views and opinions expressed on this podcast are solely those of the individuals involved and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of any law firm, company, or organization. We make no representations or warranties regarding the accuracy, completeness, or applicability of the information presented. Any reliance on the information in this podcast is at your own risk. Laws are constantly changing, and every situation is unique. You should always seek the advice of a qualified attorney for your specific legal concerns.