
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
In this episode, we explore the recent Ontario Court of Appeal decision in R. v. Nnane, 2024 ONCA 609. Nnane appealed these convictions on the grounds that his trial was unfair due to ineffective assistance from his trial counsel. The Court of Appeal, led by Justice David M. Paciocco, critically examined the performance of Nnane's trial counsel, highlighting key failures that undermined the fairness of the trial. As a result, the court allowed Nnane's appeal, set aside his convictions, and ordered a new trial. Join us as we dissect this significant ruling, discuss the standards for effective legal representation, and the implications this case holds for the criminal justice system.
In this episode, we explore the recent Ontario Court of Appeal decision in R. v. Nnane, 2024 ONCA 609. Nnane appealed these convictions on the grounds that his trial was unfair due to ineffective assistance from his trial counsel. The Court of Appeal, led by Justice David M. Paciocco, critically examined the performance of Nnane's trial counsel, highlighting key failures that undermined the fairness of the trial. As a result, the court allowed Nnane's appeal, set aside his convictions, and ordered a new trial. Join us as we dissect this significant ruling, discuss the standards for effective legal representation, and the implications this case holds for the criminal justice system.