
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Using a simple framework to get better results from ChatGPT, Copilot, and other AI tools
Lawyers already know how to structure thinking—we learned it for the bar exam with IRAC.
But when it comes to AI, most of us were never given a framework for how to communicate with it.
In this episode, we introduce RTCF (Role, Task, Context, Format)—a simple, flexible structure that helps lawyers get better, more useful results from AI tools like ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Copilot.
We also explain why prompting is the “heart and soul” of AI usage, and why the real issue isn’t “garbage in, garbage out”—it’s whether you’re giving AI a usable version of the case.
This episode kicks off our Prompt Strategy Series, where we’ll apply these ideas to real legal workflows like marketing, client intake, document review, and more.
🔑 Key TakeawaysR — Role (Optional)
Shape perspective, tone, or point of view
Examples: judge, opposing counsel, mediator
T — Task
Tell the AI exactly what you want it to do
Examples: summarize, compare, identify gaps, rewrite
C — Context (Most Important)
Give the AI a usable version of the case:
F — Format
Control how the answer is delivered
Examples: bullet points, checklist, memo, client-friendly summary
This episode launches a new series where we’ll apply prompting to:
A lawyer asked a Facebook group for a sample motion to extend the automatic stay.
Takeaway:
Flintstones Level
Add one more sentence to your prompt before hitting enter
→ “Summarize this in bullet points for a client with no legal background”
Simpsons Level
Start using structure intentionally
→ Combine task + format + some context
Jetsons Level
Build systems, not just prompts
→ Organize case files so AI can work from them
00:00 – Introduction & IRAC analogy
03:30 – Prompt Strategy Series
06:30 – RTCF overview
08:00 – Role
12:00 – Task
16:30 – Context
23:30 – Jetsons workflow
25:30 – Format
27:30 – Practice Signal & FSJ
If you found this episode helpful, follow the show and share it with a colleague who’s exploring AI in their practice.
By Ron DrescherUsing a simple framework to get better results from ChatGPT, Copilot, and other AI tools
Lawyers already know how to structure thinking—we learned it for the bar exam with IRAC.
But when it comes to AI, most of us were never given a framework for how to communicate with it.
In this episode, we introduce RTCF (Role, Task, Context, Format)—a simple, flexible structure that helps lawyers get better, more useful results from AI tools like ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Copilot.
We also explain why prompting is the “heart and soul” of AI usage, and why the real issue isn’t “garbage in, garbage out”—it’s whether you’re giving AI a usable version of the case.
This episode kicks off our Prompt Strategy Series, where we’ll apply these ideas to real legal workflows like marketing, client intake, document review, and more.
🔑 Key TakeawaysR — Role (Optional)
Shape perspective, tone, or point of view
Examples: judge, opposing counsel, mediator
T — Task
Tell the AI exactly what you want it to do
Examples: summarize, compare, identify gaps, rewrite
C — Context (Most Important)
Give the AI a usable version of the case:
F — Format
Control how the answer is delivered
Examples: bullet points, checklist, memo, client-friendly summary
This episode launches a new series where we’ll apply prompting to:
A lawyer asked a Facebook group for a sample motion to extend the automatic stay.
Takeaway:
Flintstones Level
Add one more sentence to your prompt before hitting enter
→ “Summarize this in bullet points for a client with no legal background”
Simpsons Level
Start using structure intentionally
→ Combine task + format + some context
Jetsons Level
Build systems, not just prompts
→ Organize case files so AI can work from them
00:00 – Introduction & IRAC analogy
03:30 – Prompt Strategy Series
06:30 – RTCF overview
08:00 – Role
12:00 – Task
16:30 – Context
23:30 – Jetsons workflow
25:30 – Format
27:30 – Practice Signal & FSJ
If you found this episode helpful, follow the show and share it with a colleague who’s exploring AI in their practice.