Compensating and directive controls often serve as the bridge between policy and practice, offering essential flexibility and guidance in environments where standard controls may not be viable. This episode explains compensating controls as alternative safeguards—deployed when ideal solutions, such as specific encryption technologies or access enforcement mechanisms, are not available due to technical, financial, or operational constraints. These controls must meet the intent and rigor of the original requirement and are often used in compliance frameworks to maintain equivalency. Directive controls, meanwhile, are focused on driving user behavior through written policies, signage, procedures, and security briefings, helping to instill a culture of security awareness and accountability. We explore real-world use cases for both control types, emphasizing how they support security posture without introducing unnecessary friction. Whether it's replacing a physical access system with a manual logging procedure or issuing formal instructions during security onboarding, these control types reinforce structure and intent where direct enforcement may not be possible.