
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Welcome Back Caffeine Casefilers! In this weeks episode I talk about the strange case of Ken Parks and how his sleeping disorder led him to killing and the attempted killing of his Mother and Father in-law
In the early morning hours of May 24, 1987, 23-year-old Ken Parks drove 20 kilometers from Pickering to Scarborough, let himself into his in-laws’ home with a spare key, and brutally attacked them with a tire iron, killing his mother-in-law . Covered in blood, he then drove to a police station and confessed, uttering the chilling words, “I think I have just killed two people” .
This seems like an open-and-shut murder case, but what if the killer has absolutely no memory of the crime? Parks’ defense was one of the most bizarre in Canadian legal history: he claimed he was asleep. This episode explores the landmark Supreme Court case R v Parks, diving into the science of sleepwalking, the distinction between “insane” and “non-insane” automatism, and the public’s skepticism over whether a man could commit such violent acts without consciousness or intent. Was this the perfect crime or a genuine neurological tragedy? Tune in to hear how a jury ultimately answered that question and set a precedent that still echoes today
Follow Dark Roast for weekly episodes
Instagram: @darkroastcaffeinecasefiles
Substack: @darkroastcaffeinecasefiles
Facebook: Dark Roast: Caffeine Casefiles Podcast
Spotify: Dark Roast Caffeine Casefiles
Youtube: Dark Roast: Caffeine Casefiles
Email: [email protected]
Web: Dark Roast: Caffeine Case files by Caitlin Francois | Substack
Rate and Review:If you enjoyed this episode, please rate us 5 stars and leave a review on Spotify. It helps other true crime and coffee lovers find the show.
By Caitlin FrancoisWelcome Back Caffeine Casefilers! In this weeks episode I talk about the strange case of Ken Parks and how his sleeping disorder led him to killing and the attempted killing of his Mother and Father in-law
In the early morning hours of May 24, 1987, 23-year-old Ken Parks drove 20 kilometers from Pickering to Scarborough, let himself into his in-laws’ home with a spare key, and brutally attacked them with a tire iron, killing his mother-in-law . Covered in blood, he then drove to a police station and confessed, uttering the chilling words, “I think I have just killed two people” .
This seems like an open-and-shut murder case, but what if the killer has absolutely no memory of the crime? Parks’ defense was one of the most bizarre in Canadian legal history: he claimed he was asleep. This episode explores the landmark Supreme Court case R v Parks, diving into the science of sleepwalking, the distinction between “insane” and “non-insane” automatism, and the public’s skepticism over whether a man could commit such violent acts without consciousness or intent. Was this the perfect crime or a genuine neurological tragedy? Tune in to hear how a jury ultimately answered that question and set a precedent that still echoes today
Follow Dark Roast for weekly episodes
Instagram: @darkroastcaffeinecasefiles
Substack: @darkroastcaffeinecasefiles
Facebook: Dark Roast: Caffeine Casefiles Podcast
Spotify: Dark Roast Caffeine Casefiles
Youtube: Dark Roast: Caffeine Casefiles
Email: [email protected]
Web: Dark Roast: Caffeine Case files by Caitlin Francois | Substack
Rate and Review:If you enjoyed this episode, please rate us 5 stars and leave a review on Spotify. It helps other true crime and coffee lovers find the show.