
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
In this episode we discuss the fact that although Ruth Bader Ginsburg fought the good fight early on for the monetary equal rights of both women and men her belief in judicial activism added to the judicial tyranny of the court. This tyranny can be traced back to John Marshall's usurpation of the right of judicial review as far back as 1803 in Marbury vs. Madison. Because of her belief that the Constitution is a living document, an idea pushed by Woodrow Wilson, the court has become the most dominant branch of government. This was not the original intent of the Founding Fathers.
In this episode we discuss the fact that although Ruth Bader Ginsburg fought the good fight early on for the monetary equal rights of both women and men her belief in judicial activism added to the judicial tyranny of the court. This tyranny can be traced back to John Marshall's usurpation of the right of judicial review as far back as 1803 in Marbury vs. Madison. Because of her belief that the Constitution is a living document, an idea pushed by Woodrow Wilson, the court has become the most dominant branch of government. This was not the original intent of the Founding Fathers.