Introduction
Brought to you by the letters C2H5OH
H H
H - C - C- O - H
H H
Gear Review: Notebooks
Rite-in-the-Rain notebooks
Pros: Durable, waterproof, clear and effective
Cons: Cost, needs a pencil or sharpie etc to work
Memo books
Pros: cheap, can write on anything, can tear pages out
Cons: not durable, not waterproof, etc.
Field Notes
Pros: cheap, accessories, variants
Cons: falls apart, not good for tearing out pages
Phone/Tablet
Pros: easy to use, already have it, some detailed fancy apps for note-taking
Cons: risky to use on scene, require battery charge, may get busted
Premise
Reasonable and intelligent courses of action that may differ from the standard or norm.
Case 1: Hazmat spill
Call: E5, M2, E7, BC2, TR1, R5: crash with injuries, interstate 70, urban area- vehicle into tanker truck (time 20:00, Monday PM)
Conditions on arrival: SUV vs tanker truck with placard 1993 (Diesel fuel). Driver of SUV trapped in vehicle, driver of truck reports no one else in truck, believes the fuel is leaking. You observe a leak from the tank onto the ground/snow
Highway is shut down by state police, and are asking about evacuations and such.
Crash is located near an apartment block (just off the freeway), and other housing and commercial structures adjacent to freeway.
Weather
Cold! Air temp of 5F, 3" snow on the ground, light winds (0-4 mph). RH 20%
What would you do ?
What the book (ERG) says:
Initial isolation: 150 ft
Large spill: Isolate 1000 ft downwind
Affect rescue and then later deal with spill
What actually makes sense:
Flashpoint of diesel fuel: 136F
What actual risks exist to the responders? What risks to the public?
Fire? No, not really. Temp is far below the flashpoint so not a real concern
Tox? Limited
Crash? Yes, driver is trapped
What actions make sense?
Affect rescue - PPE: full structure gear with SCBA
Plug the leak
Keep highway closed.
Case 2:
glucagon for bb overdose
Intentional overdose of benzos
La protocols
Opiate for chest pain
Opiates for anything
CaCl for neurotoxin
Prophylactic bicarb/CaCl
Therapeutic hyperventilation
Case 3: Training with Failure as the Only Result
Classic example: Kobayashi Maru exercise
The notional primary goal of the exercise is to rescue the civilian vessel Kobayashi Maru in a simulated battle with the Klingons. The disabled ship is located in the Klingon Neutral Zone, and any Starfleet ship entering the zone would cause an interstellar incident. The approaching cadet crew must decide whether to attempt rescue of the Kobayashi Maru crew – endangering their own ship and lives – or leave the Kobayashi Maru to certain destruction. If the cadet chooses to attempt rescue, the simulation is designed to guarantee that the cadet's ship is destroyed with the loss of all crew members.
From
Attempt to rescue the Kobayashi Maru's crew and passengers, which involves violating the Neutral Zone and thereby provoking the Klingons into hostile action or possibly an all-out war; or
Abandon the Kobayashi Maru, preventing war with the Klingons but leaving the crew and passengers of the freighter to probable death.
From
Training too often has a happy ending - switching to contingency isn't required, nothing unusual is required