Oral Argument

Episode 176: Ultimate Monday


Listen Later

A full hour of pre-roll before our extended conversation (in the next episode) with Ian Samuel. Opening topics: Words, Joe's new paper, phones and their spam and locations. We argue about how to have an argument. Then we stumble into a psychological typology of judginess and prescriptivism. The heartland of the episode concerns the self, law, death, being and non-being, Joe's youthful fear of blindness, the external and internal point of view, the reality of firehouses, and law as a social practice for reaching acceptable social conclusions vs. law as a queryable thing. (Other potential show titles: Pure Pre-Roll, The Jerk Box, and The Jailor.)

This show’s links:

  • About "antepenultimate" (including links to "propreantepenultimate")
  • About Battle Royale games
  • Tim Dowling, Order Force: The Old Grammar Rule We All Obey Without Realising
  • Joe Miller, Law's Semantic Self-Portrait: Discerning Doctrine with Co-Citation Networks and Keywords
  • Carpenter v. United States
  • Anil Seth, The Real Problem (on the problem of consciousness)
  • Philip Bobbitt, Constitutional Fate: Theory of the Constitution,
  • ...more
    View all episodesView all episodes
    Download on the App Store

    Oral ArgumentBy Joe Miller and Christian Turner

    • 4.7
    • 4.7
    • 4.7
    • 4.7
    • 4.7

    4.7

    111 ratings