It’s not often there’s breaking news in the world of academic articles on gaming, but a potential retraction of an article is worth talking about.
A 2014 study called “Boom, Headshot! Effect of Video Game Play and Controller Type on Firing Aim and Accuracy†concluded that playing games with a gun-shaped controller, even briefly, will make the player much more accurate at shooting a real gun.
That study went on to be cited in policy documents and the news, but there’s just one problem: some of the data may have been falsified or manipulated.
What does this mean for academic gaming research? Can or should we trust a single published study?
Show Notes & Links
Boom, Headshot! Effect of Video Game Play and Controller Type on Firing Aim and Accuracy, by Brad Bushman & Jodi Whitaker, 2014, Communication ResearchDispute over shooter video games may kill recent paper (Retraction Watch)Analyses of Miscoded Data, a timeline of the investigation into the article’s dataOrigins of the “Boom, Headshot†memeAndrew Przybylski on TwitterDo violent video games play a role in shootings? (CNN)APA’s Resolution on Violent Video GamesMore details on replication rates of academic studiesOther games mentioned in this episode:
Mario Kart 8Duck HuntResident Evil 4Wii PlaySuper Mario GalaxyHaloSuper ScopePongAsteroids