<p>In this episode I discuss why one should read Laruelle from the point of view of six criteria: anti-authoritarianism, hyper-deconstruction,  positivity, the Absolute, synthesis of humanity and rigour, and  de-schooling philosophy.</p>

In this episode I discuss why one should read Laruelle from the point of view of six criteria: anti-authoritarianism, hyper-deconstruction, positivity, the Absolute, synthesis of humanity and rigour, and de-schooling philosophy.

<p>In this episode I discuss why one should read Laruelle from the point of view of six criteria: anti-authoritarianism, hyper-deconstruction, &nbsp;positivity, the Absolute, synthesis of humanity and rigour, and &nbsp;de-schooling philosophy.</p>

Episode 2: Motivations

This is a philosophical hyper-book, a work in progress aimed at giving the first book length commentary on Alain Badiou's THE IMMANENCE OF TRUTHS, François Laruelle’s A BIOGRAPHY OF ORDINARY MAN, Laruelle's TETRALOGOS, and Slavoj Zizek's SEX AND THE FAILED ABSOLUTE. A classical scholarly or academic approach to reading these books is inappropriate to their subject matter, so a thought-in-the-making approach may show itself more suitable. The hyper-book form, composed of video-book, audio podcast, blog posts, and interviews is particularly adapted to this read-along, think-it-through approach.

Share Episode 2: Motivations

Sign up to save your podcasts

Episode 2: Motivations

Episode 2: Motivations

More shows like HYPER-THINKING THE ABSOLUTE: Badiou, Laruelle, Zizek

Why Theory