On any day we can stumble upon what is made known for the first time, finding it by chance as I did while observing Justice in action, a televised court scene shown on YouTube. It alerted my intellect to think twice about defining reality as perception according to Justice and how such a conclusion could be drawn when I heard from a lawyer who said to someone else in that judicial environment, “Reality is perception,” according to Justice. It caught my attention. So, I wrote it down to make time later for delving into this conclusion. I anticipated comparing it mentally with conception, which I also consider closely related to the metaphysical generalized conceptioning field of thought and that systems are conceptual independent of size, time-size, time-size frequency. At minimum the system is the first subdivision of Universe that divides it into six parts.

Apparently, when Justice leaves out, omits Universe, any conclusion can be drawn but the geometry of it would not yet consciously derive from topology referential to the minimum thinkable set, the minimum structural system. Since and after all, the definition of perception according to the Oxford University Press Dictionary and Thesaurus is the ability to see, hear, or become aware of something through the senses. Perception is the process of perceiving. It is a way of intuitive understanding and insight. The origin of it is Latin percipere ‘seize, understand’.