Episode 27 wird bestimmt von Narrativen – mal explizit, mal implizit. Es geht um Definitionen von Open Pedagogy, The Social Life of Learning Analytics, Web Annotation, (Alp)Träume, und kostenfreie Online-Kurse (the animal formerly known as MOOC).
Shownotes: docs.google.com/document/d/1JgqyW…/edit?usp=sharing
Was wir trinken
Markus: Augustiner Helles
Was wir gemacht haben
Vortrag DGWF Tagung vorbereitenAm Webinar von e-teaching.org/HFD teilgenommen: “Strategien für Hochschullehre im digitalen Zeitalter”Workshop in Lübeck mit dem DISC (TU Kaiserslautern) Late first thoughts: TowardsOpenness at OER17Virtual Buddy für eine VC Session vom #ccsummit mit Alek Tarkowski, Lisette KalshovenVortrag Copyright und Creative Commons in der Veranstaltung “Refugees Welcome – Aber Wie?” http://refugees-welcome.blogs.uni-hamburg.de/Feedback
Oliver Tacke, Manchmal steckt das Wichtige im InterludiumWas wir gelesen haben
Maha Bali; Curation of Posts on Open PedagogyJim Luke; What’s Open? Are OER necessary?“If openness in resources is defined by permissions to use property, I argue that openness in pedagogy must be measured in terms of freedom, authority, and power of the learning process. To place the resources, the OER, as the prerequisite of openness of pedagogy is to commoditize and reify education itself, ultimately denying the possibility of critical pedagogy. Open pedagogy, and therefore open education and open learning, are more about freedom of action and authority than they are about property permissions.”Carlo Perotta, Ben Williamson; The social life of Learning Analytics: cluster analysis and the ‘performance’ of algorithmic education (Danke an Martina für’s Teilen)Audrey Watters; Un-Annotatedhttps://twitter.com/telliowkuwp/status/857560049811509250https://twitter.com/funnymonkey/status/857377579753512961Doug Belshaw greift das in seinem NL auf: “A few years ago, Audrey Watters removed comments from her site due to these kinds of problems. Now, she’s fighting against ‚web annotation‘, which, at its worst, is a kind of grafitti website owners are just expected to deal with because of ‚innovation‘. Audrey begs to differ, and I think she makes some important points. The problem isn’t that we have different opinions and values; it’s that we think that other people should share them. Like petulant children, we assume that the way we see the world is how others should see it. One example of this is through the pretty reactionary focus on ‚empiricism‘ and ‚what works‘ by those who believe in traditional education.”Podcast: http://podcast.contrafabulists.com/2017/04/30/episode-52Updating our nightmares Interview mit Jill Lepore: “To believe that change is driven by technology, when technology is driven by humans, renders force and power invisible.”The Disruption MachineDhawal Shah; MOOCs started out completely free – where are they now?Was wir tun werden
Fährt zum OER Camp Süd (direkter ICE von Lübeck aus, Fahrtzeit knapp 7h) Fährt zum OER Camp West Urlaub auf FormenteraBeobachtung re:publica aus sicherer Entfernung
View all episodes
