<p>In episode 3, Glenn and Grant discuss our important institutions and the tendency to tear at the very foundation of these institutions when things get contentious which begs the question of, "Is that the best thing to do and if it is, then what?"</p>

In episode 3, Glenn and Grant discuss our important institutions and the tendency to tear at the very foundation of these institutions when things get contentious which begs the question of, "Is that the best thing to do and if it is, then what?"

<p>In episode 3, Glenn and Grant discuss our important institutions and the tendency to tear at the very foundation of these&nbsp;institutions&nbsp;when things get contentious which begs the question of, "Is that the best thing to do and if it is, then what?"</p>

Episode 3: Maybe we shouldn't burn it all to the ground.

A Civil Discourse is a show where two guys and a dog discuss topics that often cause people to yell at each other.   

Your hosts, Glenn Brown and Grant EchoHawk, offer their personal thoughts on social and political issues from a fact-based perspective with appropriate historical context and supporting data to draw reasonable conclusions. Sometimes they even formulate opinions. Grant (an Indigenous American who leans left) and Glenn (an Irish Catholic American who leans right) both draw on not only the facts of an issue but also demonstrate how their own history and personal journey shapes their views on the issues discussed.  

Most importantly, because Glenn is wrong 50% of the time and Grant is wrong 50% of the time, just by pure dumb luck, occasionally these chuckleheads are able to come to a profound agreement on an issue and both be wrong at the same time!  The dog, Nueq, has yet to be wrong.

News

News Commentary

Politics

A Civil Discourse is a show where two guys and a dog discuss topics that often cause people to yell at each other. Your hosts, Glenn Brown and Grant EchoHawk, offer their personal thoughts on social and political issues from a fact-based perspective with appropriate historical context and supporting data to draw reasonable conclusions. Sometimes they even formulate opinions. Grant (an Indigenous American who leans left) and Glenn (an Irish Catholic American who leans right) both draw on not only the facts of an issue but also demonstrate how their own history and personal journey shapes their views on the issues discussed. Most importantly, because Glenn is wrong 50% of the time and Grant is wrong 50% of the time, just by pure dumb luck, occasionally these chuckleheads are able to come to a profound agreement on an issue and both be wrong at the same time! The dog, Nueq, has yet to be wrong.

Share Episode 3: Maybe we shouldn't burn it all to the ground.

Sign up to save your podcasts

Episode 3: Maybe we shouldn't burn it all to the ground.

Episode 3: Maybe we shouldn't burn it all to the ground.