In this episode, “The Review Process,” hear about the qualifications journals use to choose reviewers, how authors’ recommendations for reviewers are considered, and what happens when reviewers don’t agree.

Episode 4: The Review Process

The Society for Neuroscience introduces its inaugural podcast, The Perils of Publishing. This series is a behind-the-scenes look at what it takes to publish a scientific study. Follow two authors’ experiences in developing a study idea, conducting the experiment, organizing the data, writing the manuscript, selecting a journal, receiving reviews, and handling media attention post-publishing.

Along the way, you’ll hear about the publication process from editors at Cell Press, Neuron, and JNeurosci. They talk about what they look for when evaluating studies, what happens when reviewers don’t agree, and how to deal with negative reviews, and other useful advice. 

For more learning and discussion, visit Neuronline.SfN.org, SfN’s home for scientific training and professional development.

Science

The Society for Neuroscience introduces its inaugural podcast, The Perils of Publishing. This series is a behind-the-scenes look at what it takes to publish a scientific study. Follow two authors’ experiences in developing a study idea, conducting the experiment, organizing the data, writing the manuscript, selecting a journal, receiving reviews, and handling media attention post-publishing. Along the way, you’ll hear about the publication process from editors at Cell Press, Neuron, and JNeurosci. They talk about what they look for when evaluating studies, what happens when reviewers don’t agree, and how to deal with negative reviews, and other useful advice. For more learning and discussion, visit Neuronline.SfN.org, SfN’s home for scientific training and professional development.

Share Episode 4: The Review Process

Sign up to save your podcasts

Episode 4: The Review Process

Episode 4: The Review Process