Ryan and Lavit discuss San Francisco's new Compassionate Alternative Response Team program and ask whether it's possible that the "unhoused population" in San Francisco will truly benefit from a program that does not spend more to address the material needs of the homeless but instead attempts to change the attitude and social framing around the care that is currently on offer. Can treating homeless people as if they are "worthy of life and dignity" and relying on "trauma-informed, unarmed civilians" to provide help rather than "institutions of control" really improve conditions for the homeless in San Francisco, or is this "new" program just a rebranding effort for a project of neoliberal neglect?