We could be on this one for a while...

In this episode, Nate gives a little bit of personal back-story when it comes to his stance on Calvinism vs. Non-Calvinism. He also points out some flaws in labeling the debate as "Calvinism vs. Arminianism".

Looking ahead to the next episode, he also spells out a few things that do NOT define historical Calvinism, and a few things that modern Calvinism would benefit from focusing on (instead of what it is famous for focusing on).

To add to the conversation, send your comments and questions to:

Email: [email protected]

Instagram: @thetheologytablepodcast