ERISA Litigation episode 007 contains Bentley Tolk’s (Parr Brown Gee & Loveless, Salt Lake City, UT - ERISA litigation defense) analysis of the Supreme Court’s decision in CIGNA Corp. v. Amara. The Amara case contains important guidance on misrepresentations, plan reformation, SPDs and equitable remedies under ERISA.

ERISA Litigation episode 007 contains Bentley Tolk’s (Parr Brown Gee & Loveless, Salt Lake City, UT - ERISA litigation defense) analysis of the Supreme Court’s decision in CIGNA Corp. v. Amara. The Amara case contains important guidance on misrepresentations, plan reformation, SPDs and equitable remedies under ERISA.

ERISA Litigation episode 007 contains Bentley Tolk’s (Parr Brown Gee &amp; Loveless, Salt Lake City, UT - ERISA litigation defense) analysis of the Supreme Court’s decision in CIGNA Corp. v. Amara. The Amara case contains important guidance on misrepresentations, plan reformation, SPDs and equitable remedies under ERISA.

ERISA Litigation 7 - CIGNA Corp. v. Amara

A collection of podcast episodes by Erisa Litigation that discuss a variety of litigation topics and past cases.

Share ERISA Litigation 7 - CIGNA Corp. v. Amara

Sign up to save your podcasts

ERISA Litigation 7 - CIGNA Corp. v. Amara

ERISA Litigation 7 - CIGNA Corp. v. Amara