Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
Share EU's AI Act: Safeguarding Rights, Regulating High-Risk Models
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Or
EU's AI Act: Safeguarding Rights, Regulating High-Risk Models
As I sit here, sipping my morning coffee, I'm reflecting on the monumental changes unfolding in the world of artificial intelligence. The European Union's Artificial Intelligence Act, or EU AI Act, is at the forefront of this transformation. Just a few days ago, on January 24, 2025, the European Commission highlighted the Act's upcoming milestones, and I'm eager to delve into the implications.
Starting February 2, 2025, the EU AI Act will prohibit AI systems that pose unacceptable risks to the fundamental rights of EU citizens. This includes AI systems designed for behavioral manipulation, social scoring by public authorities, and real-time remote biometric identification for law enforcement purposes. The ban is a significant step towards safeguarding citizens' rights and freedoms.
But that's not all. By August 2, 2025, providers of General-Purpose AI Models, or GPAI models, will face new obligations. These models, including Large Language Models like ChatGPT, will be subject to enhanced oversight due to their potential for significant societal impact. The Act categorizes GPAI models into two categories: standard GPAI, which is subject to general obligations, and systemic-risk GPAI, which is defined by their use of computing power exceeding 10^25 Floating Point Operations during training.
The EU AI Act's phased approach means that businesses operating in the EU will need to comply with different regulatory requirements at various intervals. For instance, organizations must ensure adequate AI literacy among employees involved in the use and deployment of AI systems starting February 2, 2025. This is a crucial step towards mitigating the risks associated with AI and ensuring transparency in AI operations.
As I ponder the implications of the EU AI Act, I'm reminded of the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights' (FRA) work in this area. The FRA is currently recruiting Seconded National Experts to support their research activities on AI and digitalization, including remote biometric identification and high-risk AI systems.
The EU AI Act is a landmark piece of legislation that will have far-reaching consequences for businesses and individuals alike. As the world grapples with the challenges and opportunities presented by AI, the EU is taking a proactive approach to regulating this technology. As I finish my coffee, I'm left wondering what the future holds for AI governance and how the EU AI Act will shape the global landscape. One thing is certain: the next few months will be pivotal in determining the course of AI regulation.
Starting February 2, 2025, the EU AI Act will prohibit AI systems that pose unacceptable risks to the fundamental rights of EU citizens. This includes AI systems designed for behavioral manipulation, social scoring by public authorities, and real-time remote biometric identification for law enforcement purposes. The ban is a significant step towards safeguarding citizens' rights and freedoms.
But that's not all. By August 2, 2025, providers of General-Purpose AI Models, or GPAI models, will face new obligations. These models, including Large Language Models like ChatGPT, will be subject to enhanced oversight due to their potential for significant societal impact. The Act categorizes GPAI models into two categories: standard GPAI, which is subject to general obligations, and systemic-risk GPAI, which is defined by their use of computing power exceeding 10^25 Floating Point Operations during training.
The EU AI Act's phased approach means that businesses operating in the EU will need to comply with different regulatory requirements at various intervals. For instance, organizations must ensure adequate AI literacy among employees involved in the use and deployment of AI systems starting February 2, 2025. This is a crucial step towards mitigating the risks associated with AI and ensuring transparency in AI operations.
As I ponder the implications of the EU AI Act, I'm reminded of the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights' (FRA) work in this area. The FRA is currently recruiting Seconded National Experts to support their research activities on AI and digitalization, including remote biometric identification and high-risk AI systems.
The EU AI Act is a landmark piece of legislation that will have far-reaching consequences for businesses and individuals alike. As the world grapples with the challenges and opportunities presented by AI, the EU is taking a proactive approach to regulating this technology. As I finish my coffee, I'm left wondering what the future holds for AI governance and how the EU AI Act will shape the global landscape. One thing is certain: the next few months will be pivotal in determining the course of AI regulation.
View all episodes
By Quiet. PleaseAs I sit here, sipping my morning coffee, I'm reflecting on the monumental changes unfolding in the world of artificial intelligence. The European Union's Artificial Intelligence Act, or EU AI Act, is at the forefront of this transformation. Just a few days ago, on January 24, 2025, the European Commission highlighted the Act's upcoming milestones, and I'm eager to delve into the implications.
Starting February 2, 2025, the EU AI Act will prohibit AI systems that pose unacceptable risks to the fundamental rights of EU citizens. This includes AI systems designed for behavioral manipulation, social scoring by public authorities, and real-time remote biometric identification for law enforcement purposes. The ban is a significant step towards safeguarding citizens' rights and freedoms.
But that's not all. By August 2, 2025, providers of General-Purpose AI Models, or GPAI models, will face new obligations. These models, including Large Language Models like ChatGPT, will be subject to enhanced oversight due to their potential for significant societal impact. The Act categorizes GPAI models into two categories: standard GPAI, which is subject to general obligations, and systemic-risk GPAI, which is defined by their use of computing power exceeding 10^25 Floating Point Operations during training.
The EU AI Act's phased approach means that businesses operating in the EU will need to comply with different regulatory requirements at various intervals. For instance, organizations must ensure adequate AI literacy among employees involved in the use and deployment of AI systems starting February 2, 2025. This is a crucial step towards mitigating the risks associated with AI and ensuring transparency in AI operations.
As I ponder the implications of the EU AI Act, I'm reminded of the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights' (FRA) work in this area. The FRA is currently recruiting Seconded National Experts to support their research activities on AI and digitalization, including remote biometric identification and high-risk AI systems.
The EU AI Act is a landmark piece of legislation that will have far-reaching consequences for businesses and individuals alike. As the world grapples with the challenges and opportunities presented by AI, the EU is taking a proactive approach to regulating this technology. As I finish my coffee, I'm left wondering what the future holds for AI governance and how the EU AI Act will shape the global landscape. One thing is certain: the next few months will be pivotal in determining the course of AI regulation.
Starting February 2, 2025, the EU AI Act will prohibit AI systems that pose unacceptable risks to the fundamental rights of EU citizens. This includes AI systems designed for behavioral manipulation, social scoring by public authorities, and real-time remote biometric identification for law enforcement purposes. The ban is a significant step towards safeguarding citizens' rights and freedoms.
But that's not all. By August 2, 2025, providers of General-Purpose AI Models, or GPAI models, will face new obligations. These models, including Large Language Models like ChatGPT, will be subject to enhanced oversight due to their potential for significant societal impact. The Act categorizes GPAI models into two categories: standard GPAI, which is subject to general obligations, and systemic-risk GPAI, which is defined by their use of computing power exceeding 10^25 Floating Point Operations during training.
The EU AI Act's phased approach means that businesses operating in the EU will need to comply with different regulatory requirements at various intervals. For instance, organizations must ensure adequate AI literacy among employees involved in the use and deployment of AI systems starting February 2, 2025. This is a crucial step towards mitigating the risks associated with AI and ensuring transparency in AI operations.
As I ponder the implications of the EU AI Act, I'm reminded of the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights' (FRA) work in this area. The FRA is currently recruiting Seconded National Experts to support their research activities on AI and digitalization, including remote biometric identification and high-risk AI systems.
The EU AI Act is a landmark piece of legislation that will have far-reaching consequences for businesses and individuals alike. As the world grapples with the challenges and opportunities presented by AI, the EU is taking a proactive approach to regulating this technology. As I finish my coffee, I'm left wondering what the future holds for AI governance and how the EU AI Act will shape the global landscape. One thing is certain: the next few months will be pivotal in determining the course of AI regulation.