Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
Share EU's Landmark AI Act Bans Risky AI Practices, Reshaping Global Landscape
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Or
EU's Landmark AI Act Bans Risky AI Practices, Reshaping Global Landscape
As I sit here, sipping my coffee and staring at the latest updates on my screen, I am reminded that we are just a week away from a significant milestone in the world of artificial intelligence. On February 2, 2025, the European Union's Artificial Intelligence Act, or EU AI Act, will enforce a ban on AI systems that pose an unacceptable risk to people's safety and fundamental rights.
This act, which was approved by the European Parliament with a sweeping majority, sets out a comprehensive framework for regulating AI across the EU. While most of its provisions won't kick in until August 2026, the ban on prohibited AI practices is an exception, coming into force much sooner.
The list of banned AI systems includes those used for social scoring by public and private actors, inferring emotions in workplaces and educational institutions, creating or expanding facial recognition databases through untargeted scraping of facial images, and assessing or predicting the risk of a natural person committing a criminal offense based solely on profiling or assessing personality traits and characteristics.
These prohibitions are crucial, as they address some of the most intrusive and discriminatory uses of AI. For instance, social scoring systems can lead to unfair treatment and discrimination, while facial recognition databases raise serious privacy concerns.
Meanwhile, in the UK, the government has endorsed the AI Opportunities Action Plan, led by Matt Clifford, which outlines 50 recommendations for supporting innovators, investing in AI, attracting global talent, and leveraging the UK's strengths in AI development. However, the UK's approach differs significantly from the EU's, focusing on regulating only a handful of leading AI companies, unlike the EU AI Act, which affects a wider range of businesses.
As we approach the enforcement date of the EU AI Act's ban on prohibited AI systems, companies and developers must ensure they are compliant. The European Commission has tasked standardization bodies like CEN and CENELEC with developing new European standards to support the AI Act by April 30, 2025, which will provide a presumption of conformity for companies adhering to these standards.
The implications of the EU AI Act are far-reaching, setting a precedent for AI regulation globally. As we navigate this new landscape, it's essential to stay informed and engaged, ensuring that AI development aligns with ethical and societal values. With just a week to go, the clock is ticking for companies to prepare for the ban on prohibited AI systems. Will they be ready? Only time will tell.
This act, which was approved by the European Parliament with a sweeping majority, sets out a comprehensive framework for regulating AI across the EU. While most of its provisions won't kick in until August 2026, the ban on prohibited AI practices is an exception, coming into force much sooner.
The list of banned AI systems includes those used for social scoring by public and private actors, inferring emotions in workplaces and educational institutions, creating or expanding facial recognition databases through untargeted scraping of facial images, and assessing or predicting the risk of a natural person committing a criminal offense based solely on profiling or assessing personality traits and characteristics.
These prohibitions are crucial, as they address some of the most intrusive and discriminatory uses of AI. For instance, social scoring systems can lead to unfair treatment and discrimination, while facial recognition databases raise serious privacy concerns.
Meanwhile, in the UK, the government has endorsed the AI Opportunities Action Plan, led by Matt Clifford, which outlines 50 recommendations for supporting innovators, investing in AI, attracting global talent, and leveraging the UK's strengths in AI development. However, the UK's approach differs significantly from the EU's, focusing on regulating only a handful of leading AI companies, unlike the EU AI Act, which affects a wider range of businesses.
As we approach the enforcement date of the EU AI Act's ban on prohibited AI systems, companies and developers must ensure they are compliant. The European Commission has tasked standardization bodies like CEN and CENELEC with developing new European standards to support the AI Act by April 30, 2025, which will provide a presumption of conformity for companies adhering to these standards.
The implications of the EU AI Act are far-reaching, setting a precedent for AI regulation globally. As we navigate this new landscape, it's essential to stay informed and engaged, ensuring that AI development aligns with ethical and societal values. With just a week to go, the clock is ticking for companies to prepare for the ban on prohibited AI systems. Will they be ready? Only time will tell.
View all episodes
By Quiet. PleaseAs I sit here, sipping my coffee and staring at the latest updates on my screen, I am reminded that we are just a week away from a significant milestone in the world of artificial intelligence. On February 2, 2025, the European Union's Artificial Intelligence Act, or EU AI Act, will enforce a ban on AI systems that pose an unacceptable risk to people's safety and fundamental rights.
This act, which was approved by the European Parliament with a sweeping majority, sets out a comprehensive framework for regulating AI across the EU. While most of its provisions won't kick in until August 2026, the ban on prohibited AI practices is an exception, coming into force much sooner.
The list of banned AI systems includes those used for social scoring by public and private actors, inferring emotions in workplaces and educational institutions, creating or expanding facial recognition databases through untargeted scraping of facial images, and assessing or predicting the risk of a natural person committing a criminal offense based solely on profiling or assessing personality traits and characteristics.
These prohibitions are crucial, as they address some of the most intrusive and discriminatory uses of AI. For instance, social scoring systems can lead to unfair treatment and discrimination, while facial recognition databases raise serious privacy concerns.
Meanwhile, in the UK, the government has endorsed the AI Opportunities Action Plan, led by Matt Clifford, which outlines 50 recommendations for supporting innovators, investing in AI, attracting global talent, and leveraging the UK's strengths in AI development. However, the UK's approach differs significantly from the EU's, focusing on regulating only a handful of leading AI companies, unlike the EU AI Act, which affects a wider range of businesses.
As we approach the enforcement date of the EU AI Act's ban on prohibited AI systems, companies and developers must ensure they are compliant. The European Commission has tasked standardization bodies like CEN and CENELEC with developing new European standards to support the AI Act by April 30, 2025, which will provide a presumption of conformity for companies adhering to these standards.
The implications of the EU AI Act are far-reaching, setting a precedent for AI regulation globally. As we navigate this new landscape, it's essential to stay informed and engaged, ensuring that AI development aligns with ethical and societal values. With just a week to go, the clock is ticking for companies to prepare for the ban on prohibited AI systems. Will they be ready? Only time will tell.
This act, which was approved by the European Parliament with a sweeping majority, sets out a comprehensive framework for regulating AI across the EU. While most of its provisions won't kick in until August 2026, the ban on prohibited AI practices is an exception, coming into force much sooner.
The list of banned AI systems includes those used for social scoring by public and private actors, inferring emotions in workplaces and educational institutions, creating or expanding facial recognition databases through untargeted scraping of facial images, and assessing or predicting the risk of a natural person committing a criminal offense based solely on profiling or assessing personality traits and characteristics.
These prohibitions are crucial, as they address some of the most intrusive and discriminatory uses of AI. For instance, social scoring systems can lead to unfair treatment and discrimination, while facial recognition databases raise serious privacy concerns.
Meanwhile, in the UK, the government has endorsed the AI Opportunities Action Plan, led by Matt Clifford, which outlines 50 recommendations for supporting innovators, investing in AI, attracting global talent, and leveraging the UK's strengths in AI development. However, the UK's approach differs significantly from the EU's, focusing on regulating only a handful of leading AI companies, unlike the EU AI Act, which affects a wider range of businesses.
As we approach the enforcement date of the EU AI Act's ban on prohibited AI systems, companies and developers must ensure they are compliant. The European Commission has tasked standardization bodies like CEN and CENELEC with developing new European standards to support the AI Act by April 30, 2025, which will provide a presumption of conformity for companies adhering to these standards.
The implications of the EU AI Act are far-reaching, setting a precedent for AI regulation globally. As we navigate this new landscape, it's essential to stay informed and engaged, ensuring that AI development aligns with ethical and societal values. With just a week to go, the clock is ticking for companies to prepare for the ban on prohibited AI systems. Will they be ready? Only time will tell.