
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Send us a text
Anterior vs. Lateral Approach in Hip Fracture Surgery: What's Best for Recovery? 🦴
In this inaugural episode of the AHF Podcast's new series 'Evidence and Impact,' host Joe Schwab delves into a recent award-winning paper by Woolnough and colleagues on the effectiveness of the anterior approach in hip arthroplasty for recovery. 📊 The study, titled 'The Anterior Approach Does Not Improve Recovery after Hemiarthroplasty for Hip Fractures,' was published in the Journal of Arthroplasty in 2025. The trial involves a comprehensive comparison between anterior and lateral surgical approaches, focusing on elderly hip fracture patients. 🏥 Joe dissects the methodology, findings, and limitations of the study, questioning whether the anterior approach truly offers a recovery advantage. 🧐 Key takeaways include the feasibility of randomized controlled trials in this demographic, the importance of functional outcomes, and the realization that surgical approach may not be a decisive factor for recovery. 🎓 Join the discussion in the comments and share your thoughts on this fascinating topic! 💬
Zotero
For those of you who use Zotero to mange your references, you can access the AHF Podcast Evidence & Impact Zotero group by clicking on the following link:
https://www.zotero.org/groups/6125247/ahfpod_evidenceimpact
Study Paper
Woolnough T, Horton I, Garceau S, Beaulé PE, Feibel RJ, Gofton W, et al. The John Charnley Award: The Anterior Approach Does Not Improve Recovery after Hemiarthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fracture. A Randomized Controlled Trial. The Journal of Arthroplasty 2025;40:S17-S24.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2025.04.030.
Additional resources used in preparing this video:
By Anterior Hip Foundation5
44 ratings
Send us a text
Anterior vs. Lateral Approach in Hip Fracture Surgery: What's Best for Recovery? 🦴
In this inaugural episode of the AHF Podcast's new series 'Evidence and Impact,' host Joe Schwab delves into a recent award-winning paper by Woolnough and colleagues on the effectiveness of the anterior approach in hip arthroplasty for recovery. 📊 The study, titled 'The Anterior Approach Does Not Improve Recovery after Hemiarthroplasty for Hip Fractures,' was published in the Journal of Arthroplasty in 2025. The trial involves a comprehensive comparison between anterior and lateral surgical approaches, focusing on elderly hip fracture patients. 🏥 Joe dissects the methodology, findings, and limitations of the study, questioning whether the anterior approach truly offers a recovery advantage. 🧐 Key takeaways include the feasibility of randomized controlled trials in this demographic, the importance of functional outcomes, and the realization that surgical approach may not be a decisive factor for recovery. 🎓 Join the discussion in the comments and share your thoughts on this fascinating topic! 💬
Zotero
For those of you who use Zotero to mange your references, you can access the AHF Podcast Evidence & Impact Zotero group by clicking on the following link:
https://www.zotero.org/groups/6125247/ahfpod_evidenceimpact
Study Paper
Woolnough T, Horton I, Garceau S, Beaulé PE, Feibel RJ, Gofton W, et al. The John Charnley Award: The Anterior Approach Does Not Improve Recovery after Hemiarthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fracture. A Randomized Controlled Trial. The Journal of Arthroplasty 2025;40:S17-S24.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2025.04.030.
Additional resources used in preparing this video:

4,372 Listeners

42 Listeners

156 Listeners