In this episode of The Pathology Report, host A/Prof Daniel Owens is joined by forensic pathologists Dr Jack Garland, Dr Stephen Wills and Dr Hans de Boer to explore how evidence in forensic pathology is interpreted, presented and examined.

Our guests share personal insights into what it's like to provide expert opinions in legal and courtroom contexts. In discussing the practical realities of forensic evidence interpretation and the professional responsibilities of expert witnesses, they highlight the importance of remaining grounded and being honest about their limitations.

The key, they say, is to help courts to make informed decisions based on the evidence, while carefully navigating the complex and often unrealistic expectations of the legal system.

This podcast provides information for pathologists, laboratory scientists and other clinicians involved in medicolegal practice and tackles some important questions:

• How do you distinguish between evidence and opinion?
• What is the role of empirical evidence?
• How do you define ‘evidence robustness’?
• How do you handle courtroom testimony challenges?
• What is the impact of the media on forensics?
• What is the influence of experience?
• How do you deal with complex case scenarios?

RCPA Members

This podcast is an RCPA-endorsed CPD activity. Each episode gives you an opportunity to gain CPD hours in three easy steps:

• Step 1. Listen or watch the podcast here, on your favourite podcast channel or on YouTube
• Step 2. To claim your CPD hours, please complete and pass this short online quiz
• Step 3. Sit back and let us load your CPD hours into your CPD profile for you

The Pathology Report is produced by the Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia and is part of the Talking HealthTech Podcast Network.

Learn more about the RCPA at rcpa.edu.au and discover other shows in the network at talkinghealthtech.com/podcast/network.