Sign up to save your podcasts
Or
Share Expansion
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Share to email
Share to Facebook
Share to X
Or
Expansion
Expansion.mp3
Expansion.mp4
Expansion-Unplugged-Underground-XXIX.mp3
Expansion-Unplugged-Underground-XXIX.mp4
Expansion-Animation-1.mp4
Expansion-Animation-2.mp4
Expansion-intro.mp3
[Intro]
The expansion of man
(Into a vacuum)
[Verse 1]
How far will we go
(Will we explode)
How low will we go
(Will we implode)
[Chorus]
The reign of the golden age
(Self-sabotage)
The writing of the final page
(Man’s all the rage)
[Bridge]
The expansion of man
(Into a vacuum)
[Verse 2]
How much do we know
(What’s our ignorance)
How low will we go
(What’s our arrogance)
[Chorus]
The reign of the golden age
(Self-sabotage)
The writing of the final page
(Man’s all the rage)
[Bridge]
The expansion of man
(Into a vacuum)
[Outro]
The reign of the golden age
(Self-sabotage)
The writing of the final page
(Man’s all the rage)
So, the moral of the story goes:
(Know your no’s)
Know your no’s
ABOUT THE SONG AND THE SCIENCE
What’s happening in the Arctic is best understood as a 21st-century expansionist competition, driven by climate change, resources, and future trade routes. Russia is the most overtly expansionist actor, but the United States is also deeply engaged in a strategic contest for control and influence. This is not about today’s shipping volumes or current resource extraction — it’s about locking in dominance over a future Arctic that no longer exists as ice.
Below is a clear, non-rhetorical breakdown of what’s actually going on.
1. Climate change created a new geopolitical frontier
The Arctic is warming four times faster than the global average. That has triggered three irreversible shifts:
New shipping lanes (Northern Sea Route, Northwest Passage)
Access to massive untapped resources (oil, gas, rare earths, fisheries)
Military mobility in a region that was once naturally defended by ice
This is analogous to the opening of the Suez or Panama Canal — except it’s permanent and planet-wide.
2. Russia: explicit Arctic expansionism and de facto colonization
Russia is the dominant Arctic power today, and its strategy is openly expansionist.
What Russia is doing:
Claims over 50% of the Arctic coastline
Has reopened or built more than 50 Arctic military bases
Deployed nuclear-capable weapons systems north of the Arctic Circle
Operates the world’s only nuclear icebreaker fleet
Claims vast sections of the Arctic seabed under UNCLOS to control resources
Treats the Northern Sea Route as sovereign territory, charging fees and asserting control over international shipping
Russia is not “preparing” for Arctic dominance — it is actively exercising it.
This is classic imperial behavior:
establish infrastructure → militarize → claim legal authority → extract resources → control trade routes
3. The United States: strategic counter-expansion, not neutrality
The U.S. frames its Arctic posture as “defensive,” but functionally it is a competing expansionist strategy, driven by the same incentives.
What the U.S. is doing:
Rapidly expanding Arctic military operations via Alaska
Reactivating Cold War-era Arctic bases
Investing in Arctic surveillance, missile defense, and submarine access
Pushing NATO further north (Finland, Sweden)
Explicitly defining the Arctic as a “core strategic theater”
Seeking to prevent Russia (and China) from controlling Arctic shipping lanes
The U.S. is not trying to “own” the Arctic outright — but it absolutely intends to deny Russia exclusive control, which is still a form of expansionist competition.
This is empire-logic, not altruism.
4. Shipping lanes: the real prize
The Arctic routes could:
Cut Asia–Europe shipping times by 30–40%
Bypass choke points like the Suez Canal
Redraw global trade power
Control of Arctic shipping means:
Control over fees, regulations, access
Leverage over global supply chains
Strategic dominance in future trade conflicts
Russia wants ownership.
The U.S. wants freedom of navigation under U.S.-aligned rules.
Same chessboard. Different endgames.
5. Greenland: the soft-colonization front
Greenland is the quiet flashpoint.
Why Greenland matters:
Sits astride Arctic and North Atlantic shipping routes
Hosts rare earth minerals critical to defense and clean energy
Ideal location for missile defense and early-warning systems
Key to controlling access between the Arctic and Atlantic
The U.S. position:
Maintains Pituffik Space Base (formerly Thule Air Base)
Increased diplomatic and economic pressure on Denmark
Trump’s “buy Greenland” comment was crude — but not unserious
Long-term strategy favors economic dependency and security integration, not formal annexation
This is neo-colonial influence, not 19th-century conquest — but the objective is the same: control without formal ownership.
Russia, by contrast, prefers direct territorial claims.
6. This is colonialism — just with satellites and lawyers
Neither country calls this colonialism. But functionally:
Indigenous Arctic populations have no meaningful say
Environmental damage is treated as “acceptable externalities”
Military priorities override ecological survival
Legal frameworks are used to legitimize extraction and control
The Arctic is being carved up before it’s even fully accessible, because once the ice is gone, it’s too late to negotiate power.
7. The uncomfortable truth
This is not about defense.
It’s not about trade efficiency.
It’s not even primarily about resources.
It’s about who controls the post-climate world.
Russia is acting like a traditional empire.
The U.S. is acting like a modern one.
Different styles. Same outcome.
* Our probabilistic, ensemble-based climate model — which incorporates complex socio-economic and ecological feedback loops within a dynamic, nonlinear system — projects that global temperatures are becoming unsustainable this century. This far exceeds earlier estimates of a 4°C rise over the next thousand years, highlighting a dramatic acceleration in global warming. We are now entering a phase of compound, cascading collapse, where climate, ecological, and societal systems destabilize through interlinked, self-reinforcing feedback loops.
We examine how human activities — such as deforestation, fossil fuel combustion, mass consumption, industrial agriculture, and land development — interact with ecological processes like thermal energy redistribution, carbon cycling, hydrological flow, biodiversity loss, and the spread of disease vectors. These interactions do not follow linear cause-and-effect patterns. Instead, they form complex, self-reinforcing feedback loops that can trigger rapid, system-wide transformations — often abruptly and without warning. Grasping these dynamics is crucial for accurately assessing global risks and developing effective strategies for long-term survival.
What Can I Do?
The single most important action you can take to help address the climate crisis is simple: stop burning fossil fuels. There are numerous actions you can take to contribute to saving the planet. Each person bears the responsibility to minimize pollution, discontinue the use of fossil fuels, reduce consumption, and foster a culture of love and care. The Butterfly Effect illustrates that a small change in one area can lead to significant alterations in conditions anywhere on the globe. Hence, the frequently heard statement that a fluttering butterfly in China can cause a hurricane in the Atlantic. Be a butterfly and affect the world.
Tipping points and feedback loops drive the acceleration of climate change. When one tipping point is breached and triggers others, the cascading collapse is known as the Domino Effect.
The Climate Crisis: Violent Rain | Deadly Humid Heat | Extreme Weather Events | Insurance | Trees Deforestation | Air Pollution | Rising Sea Level | Food and Water | Updates
The Human Induced Climate Change Experiment
From the album “Arctic“
View all episodes
By Expansion.mp3
Expansion.mp4
Expansion-Unplugged-Underground-XXIX.mp3
Expansion-Unplugged-Underground-XXIX.mp4
Expansion-Animation-1.mp4
Expansion-Animation-2.mp4
Expansion-intro.mp3
[Intro]
The expansion of man
(Into a vacuum)
[Verse 1]
How far will we go
(Will we explode)
How low will we go
(Will we implode)
[Chorus]
The reign of the golden age
(Self-sabotage)
The writing of the final page
(Man’s all the rage)
[Bridge]
The expansion of man
(Into a vacuum)
[Verse 2]
How much do we know
(What’s our ignorance)
How low will we go
(What’s our arrogance)
[Chorus]
The reign of the golden age
(Self-sabotage)
The writing of the final page
(Man’s all the rage)
[Bridge]
The expansion of man
(Into a vacuum)
[Outro]
The reign of the golden age
(Self-sabotage)
The writing of the final page
(Man’s all the rage)
So, the moral of the story goes:
(Know your no’s)
Know your no’s
ABOUT THE SONG AND THE SCIENCE
What’s happening in the Arctic is best understood as a 21st-century expansionist competition, driven by climate change, resources, and future trade routes. Russia is the most overtly expansionist actor, but the United States is also deeply engaged in a strategic contest for control and influence. This is not about today’s shipping volumes or current resource extraction — it’s about locking in dominance over a future Arctic that no longer exists as ice.
Below is a clear, non-rhetorical breakdown of what’s actually going on.
1. Climate change created a new geopolitical frontier
The Arctic is warming four times faster than the global average. That has triggered three irreversible shifts:
New shipping lanes (Northern Sea Route, Northwest Passage)
Access to massive untapped resources (oil, gas, rare earths, fisheries)
Military mobility in a region that was once naturally defended by ice
This is analogous to the opening of the Suez or Panama Canal — except it’s permanent and planet-wide.
2. Russia: explicit Arctic expansionism and de facto colonization
Russia is the dominant Arctic power today, and its strategy is openly expansionist.
What Russia is doing:
Claims over 50% of the Arctic coastline
Has reopened or built more than 50 Arctic military bases
Deployed nuclear-capable weapons systems north of the Arctic Circle
Operates the world’s only nuclear icebreaker fleet
Claims vast sections of the Arctic seabed under UNCLOS to control resources
Treats the Northern Sea Route as sovereign territory, charging fees and asserting control over international shipping
Russia is not “preparing” for Arctic dominance — it is actively exercising it.
This is classic imperial behavior:
establish infrastructure → militarize → claim legal authority → extract resources → control trade routes
3. The United States: strategic counter-expansion, not neutrality
The U.S. frames its Arctic posture as “defensive,” but functionally it is a competing expansionist strategy, driven by the same incentives.
What the U.S. is doing:
Rapidly expanding Arctic military operations via Alaska
Reactivating Cold War-era Arctic bases
Investing in Arctic surveillance, missile defense, and submarine access
Pushing NATO further north (Finland, Sweden)
Explicitly defining the Arctic as a “core strategic theater”
Seeking to prevent Russia (and China) from controlling Arctic shipping lanes
The U.S. is not trying to “own” the Arctic outright — but it absolutely intends to deny Russia exclusive control, which is still a form of expansionist competition.
This is empire-logic, not altruism.
4. Shipping lanes: the real prize
The Arctic routes could:
Cut Asia–Europe shipping times by 30–40%
Bypass choke points like the Suez Canal
Redraw global trade power
Control of Arctic shipping means:
Control over fees, regulations, access
Leverage over global supply chains
Strategic dominance in future trade conflicts
Russia wants ownership.
The U.S. wants freedom of navigation under U.S.-aligned rules.
Same chessboard. Different endgames.
5. Greenland: the soft-colonization front
Greenland is the quiet flashpoint.
Why Greenland matters:
Sits astride Arctic and North Atlantic shipping routes
Hosts rare earth minerals critical to defense and clean energy
Ideal location for missile defense and early-warning systems
Key to controlling access between the Arctic and Atlantic
The U.S. position:
Maintains Pituffik Space Base (formerly Thule Air Base)
Increased diplomatic and economic pressure on Denmark
Trump’s “buy Greenland” comment was crude — but not unserious
Long-term strategy favors economic dependency and security integration, not formal annexation
This is neo-colonial influence, not 19th-century conquest — but the objective is the same: control without formal ownership.
Russia, by contrast, prefers direct territorial claims.
6. This is colonialism — just with satellites and lawyers
Neither country calls this colonialism. But functionally:
Indigenous Arctic populations have no meaningful say
Environmental damage is treated as “acceptable externalities”
Military priorities override ecological survival
Legal frameworks are used to legitimize extraction and control
The Arctic is being carved up before it’s even fully accessible, because once the ice is gone, it’s too late to negotiate power.
7. The uncomfortable truth
This is not about defense.
It’s not about trade efficiency.
It’s not even primarily about resources.
It’s about who controls the post-climate world.
Russia is acting like a traditional empire.
The U.S. is acting like a modern one.
Different styles. Same outcome.
* Our probabilistic, ensemble-based climate model — which incorporates complex socio-economic and ecological feedback loops within a dynamic, nonlinear system — projects that global temperatures are becoming unsustainable this century. This far exceeds earlier estimates of a 4°C rise over the next thousand years, highlighting a dramatic acceleration in global warming. We are now entering a phase of compound, cascading collapse, where climate, ecological, and societal systems destabilize through interlinked, self-reinforcing feedback loops.
We examine how human activities — such as deforestation, fossil fuel combustion, mass consumption, industrial agriculture, and land development — interact with ecological processes like thermal energy redistribution, carbon cycling, hydrological flow, biodiversity loss, and the spread of disease vectors. These interactions do not follow linear cause-and-effect patterns. Instead, they form complex, self-reinforcing feedback loops that can trigger rapid, system-wide transformations — often abruptly and without warning. Grasping these dynamics is crucial for accurately assessing global risks and developing effective strategies for long-term survival.
What Can I Do?
The single most important action you can take to help address the climate crisis is simple: stop burning fossil fuels. There are numerous actions you can take to contribute to saving the planet. Each person bears the responsibility to minimize pollution, discontinue the use of fossil fuels, reduce consumption, and foster a culture of love and care. The Butterfly Effect illustrates that a small change in one area can lead to significant alterations in conditions anywhere on the globe. Hence, the frequently heard statement that a fluttering butterfly in China can cause a hurricane in the Atlantic. Be a butterfly and affect the world.
Tipping points and feedback loops drive the acceleration of climate change. When one tipping point is breached and triggers others, the cascading collapse is known as the Domino Effect.
The Climate Crisis: Violent Rain | Deadly Humid Heat | Extreme Weather Events | Insurance | Trees Deforestation | Air Pollution | Rising Sea Level | Food and Water | Updates
The Human Induced Climate Change Experiment
From the album “Arctic“