
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


What do you do with millions spent drilling for oil 🛢️ or searching for gold 🪙 — before you even know if anything is there?
In this episode 🎙️, we explore IFRS 6 — the standard that lives in the gray zone between hope and proof.
Exploration accounting is about uncertainty. And IFRS 6 gives companies flexibility — but not a free pass.
⸻
Key subjects covered in this episode:
• The Scope Boundary 🗺️
IFRS 6 applies:
✔️ After the entity has the legal right to explore
❌ Before technical feasibility and commercial viability are demonstrated
Before legal rights? Expense it.
After feasibility? Move to the next accounting framework.
⸻
• Capitalization Choices 🧾
Entities can develop an accounting policy for what qualifies as an Exploration & Evaluation (E&E) Asset.
Examples may include:
• Drilling costs ⛏️
• Geological studies 🧭
• Stripping costs
• Topographical surveys 📊
Flexibility exists — but consistency is required.
⸻
• Measurement Rules 💰
E&E assets are measured at cost.
However, impairment testing differs from a normal machine under IAS 16.
The risk profile is higher. So the impairment model is tailored.
⸻
• The “Trigger” Test 🚨
IFRS 6 provides specific impairment indicators, such as:
• Exploration rights expiring
• No planned budget for further exploration
• Data indicating no commercially viable reserves
• Decision to abandon the area
These signals trigger impairment testing.
⸻
• Classification 🏗️
Exploration assets can be:
✔️ Tangible (e.g., drilling equipment)
✔️ Intangible (e.g., exploration licenses)
Classification depends on nature — not the project.
⸻
• The Transition Point 🔄
Once technical feasibility and commercial viability are demonstrated:
👉 IFRS 6 no longer applies.
👉 Assets move to IAS 16 (PPE) or IAS 38.
But not before one critical step…
⸻
🔥 A Pro-Tip for your SOCPA Prep
The biggest trap is the Impairment Transition Rule 🎯.
Under IFRS 6:
✔️ Impairment can be tested at a higher level (Area of Interest) — not necessarily at a full Cash-Generating Unit level like under IAS 36.
But the moment commercial viability is proven:
👉 You must perform an impairment test under IAS 36
👉 Before reclassifying the asset
Miss that final “exit test,” and you lose the question.
IFRS 6 is about managing uncertainty responsibly.
Capitalize hope — but test it rigorously before declaring victory.
By MAFWhat do you do with millions spent drilling for oil 🛢️ or searching for gold 🪙 — before you even know if anything is there?
In this episode 🎙️, we explore IFRS 6 — the standard that lives in the gray zone between hope and proof.
Exploration accounting is about uncertainty. And IFRS 6 gives companies flexibility — but not a free pass.
⸻
Key subjects covered in this episode:
• The Scope Boundary 🗺️
IFRS 6 applies:
✔️ After the entity has the legal right to explore
❌ Before technical feasibility and commercial viability are demonstrated
Before legal rights? Expense it.
After feasibility? Move to the next accounting framework.
⸻
• Capitalization Choices 🧾
Entities can develop an accounting policy for what qualifies as an Exploration & Evaluation (E&E) Asset.
Examples may include:
• Drilling costs ⛏️
• Geological studies 🧭
• Stripping costs
• Topographical surveys 📊
Flexibility exists — but consistency is required.
⸻
• Measurement Rules 💰
E&E assets are measured at cost.
However, impairment testing differs from a normal machine under IAS 16.
The risk profile is higher. So the impairment model is tailored.
⸻
• The “Trigger” Test 🚨
IFRS 6 provides specific impairment indicators, such as:
• Exploration rights expiring
• No planned budget for further exploration
• Data indicating no commercially viable reserves
• Decision to abandon the area
These signals trigger impairment testing.
⸻
• Classification 🏗️
Exploration assets can be:
✔️ Tangible (e.g., drilling equipment)
✔️ Intangible (e.g., exploration licenses)
Classification depends on nature — not the project.
⸻
• The Transition Point 🔄
Once technical feasibility and commercial viability are demonstrated:
👉 IFRS 6 no longer applies.
👉 Assets move to IAS 16 (PPE) or IAS 38.
But not before one critical step…
⸻
🔥 A Pro-Tip for your SOCPA Prep
The biggest trap is the Impairment Transition Rule 🎯.
Under IFRS 6:
✔️ Impairment can be tested at a higher level (Area of Interest) — not necessarily at a full Cash-Generating Unit level like under IAS 36.
But the moment commercial viability is proven:
👉 You must perform an impairment test under IAS 36
👉 Before reclassifying the asset
Miss that final “exit test,” and you lose the question.
IFRS 6 is about managing uncertainty responsibly.
Capitalize hope — but test it rigorously before declaring victory.