In standard State of Hawaii fashion, this child custody evaluator recently moved to work in a different department. That transition happened shortly after this interview and her filing of my custody evaluator report which I objected to in order to prevent the document from being admitted into the evidence of my family court case due to multiple errors and inconsistencies. I will have the opportunity to cross examine this child custody evaluator and all those who participated in the interviews that produced her report at the commencement of my family court trial in January. In the first hearing my ex had a paid conventional attorney and I represented myself pro se which I feel was the primary reason I was discriminated against where the Judge favored my ex and denied my right to a Hawaiian language interpreter granting full legal and physical custody of my son to my ex without holding an evidentiary hearing.