
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


Scripture
Genesis 1:1–5 (creation, “evening and morning”)
Joshua 10:12–14 (sun “standing still” as phenomenological language)
Psalm 90:4 (God and time)
Genesis 6:3 (lifespans)
Key themes
Preparing students for what they’ll hear later (intellectual resilience)
Science defined: Not a relgion but a method. hypothesis → testing → measurement → conclusions
The Bible’s goal: theological truth, not modern scientific technical language
Why “unscientific” language doesn’t make the Bible untrue
Comparing creation models: gap theory, day-age/theistic evolution, literal days, mature creation
Tackling common objections: light-years, dinosaurs, other humans, long ages
Holding non-core issues with open hands while clinging to the center (Jesus)
Description
In this week’s FAQ episode we take on a question that often becomes a turning point for students: creation and Genesis—how does the Bible relate to science? Before we even get into the details, we talk about why this conversation can feel high-stakes and polarizing—and why it matters to be honest about what we know, what we don’t know, and what faithful Christians have disagreed about for a long time.
We begin by clarifying what science is (a method, not a competing religion) and why the “Bible vs science” debate often comes down to interpretation. Church history gives us a warning label here: the Galileo controversy wasn’t simply “science vs God,” but a case where the church confused a particular interpretation with the Bible’s intended meaning. We use examples like Joshua’s “sun stood still” (Joshua 10) and our everyday “sunrise/sunset” language to show how Scripture often speaks from human perspective without trying to give a technical astronomy lesson.
Then we turn to Genesis and outline the major approaches Christians take:
Gap theory (time between Genesis 1:1 and 1:2)
Day-age / non-literal days (including appeals like Psalm 90:4)
Literal 24-hour days (noting “evening and morning” language)
Mature creation (creation with the appearance of age)
Along the way we address the questions students actually ask:
How old is the earth? What about light-years? Dinosaurs and fossils? Were Adam and Eve the first humans? Why are Genesis lifespans so long? We discuss how some ancient number systems (like the Sumerian king lists and base-60 patterns) might help frame the conversation, while also admitting we don’t have a perfect “code” to solve every detail.
We close with the pastoral point: you don’t need a fragile faith that collapses when you encounter hard questions. You can have rational, resilient confidence in Scripture—even while holding some secondary issues with humility—because the center of Christianity is ultimately anchored in Jesus, who affirmed the Old Testament and whose life, death, and resurrection are historically grounded.
By Steve MilunovicScripture
Genesis 1:1–5 (creation, “evening and morning”)
Joshua 10:12–14 (sun “standing still” as phenomenological language)
Psalm 90:4 (God and time)
Genesis 6:3 (lifespans)
Key themes
Preparing students for what they’ll hear later (intellectual resilience)
Science defined: Not a relgion but a method. hypothesis → testing → measurement → conclusions
The Bible’s goal: theological truth, not modern scientific technical language
Why “unscientific” language doesn’t make the Bible untrue
Comparing creation models: gap theory, day-age/theistic evolution, literal days, mature creation
Tackling common objections: light-years, dinosaurs, other humans, long ages
Holding non-core issues with open hands while clinging to the center (Jesus)
Description
In this week’s FAQ episode we take on a question that often becomes a turning point for students: creation and Genesis—how does the Bible relate to science? Before we even get into the details, we talk about why this conversation can feel high-stakes and polarizing—and why it matters to be honest about what we know, what we don’t know, and what faithful Christians have disagreed about for a long time.
We begin by clarifying what science is (a method, not a competing religion) and why the “Bible vs science” debate often comes down to interpretation. Church history gives us a warning label here: the Galileo controversy wasn’t simply “science vs God,” but a case where the church confused a particular interpretation with the Bible’s intended meaning. We use examples like Joshua’s “sun stood still” (Joshua 10) and our everyday “sunrise/sunset” language to show how Scripture often speaks from human perspective without trying to give a technical astronomy lesson.
Then we turn to Genesis and outline the major approaches Christians take:
Gap theory (time between Genesis 1:1 and 1:2)
Day-age / non-literal days (including appeals like Psalm 90:4)
Literal 24-hour days (noting “evening and morning” language)
Mature creation (creation with the appearance of age)
Along the way we address the questions students actually ask:
How old is the earth? What about light-years? Dinosaurs and fossils? Were Adam and Eve the first humans? Why are Genesis lifespans so long? We discuss how some ancient number systems (like the Sumerian king lists and base-60 patterns) might help frame the conversation, while also admitting we don’t have a perfect “code” to solve every detail.
We close with the pastoral point: you don’t need a fragile faith that collapses when you encounter hard questions. You can have rational, resilient confidence in Scripture—even while holding some secondary issues with humility—because the center of Christianity is ultimately anchored in Jesus, who affirmed the Old Testament and whose life, death, and resurrection are historically grounded.