
Sign up to save your podcasts
Or


This month’s cases include:
California Supreme Court Ducks (For Now) Major Retirement
Exclusionary Rule Does Not Apply In Disciplinary Appeal, Ramirez v. State Personnel Board, 2019
DROP Benefits Can Be Prospectively Reduced, Eddington v. Dallas Police and Fire Pension
Anti-Union Animus, Not Profanity, True Basis For Firing, Lawrence County, 50 PPER ¶ 50 (Penn. LRB
Janus Does Not Impact Union’s Status As ‘Exclusive Representative,’ Mentele v. Inslee, 2019 WL 924815 (9th Cir. 2019).
LISTEN
By Richard Poulson, LRISThis month’s cases include:
California Supreme Court Ducks (For Now) Major Retirement
Exclusionary Rule Does Not Apply In Disciplinary Appeal, Ramirez v. State Personnel Board, 2019
DROP Benefits Can Be Prospectively Reduced, Eddington v. Dallas Police and Fire Pension
Anti-Union Animus, Not Profanity, True Basis For Firing, Lawrence County, 50 PPER ¶ 50 (Penn. LRB
Janus Does Not Impact Union’s Status As ‘Exclusive Representative,’ Mentele v. Inslee, 2019 WL 924815 (9th Cir. 2019).
LISTEN