This Episode is absolutely Powerful. We discuss "Reimagining Peoples Within Critical Race Theory: Not Thinking Race And Moving Away from A Victim to A Hero Approach.” It is a longer episode and is academic but I flesh out the concepts so that anyone can understand the technicality of some discussions. The episode is broken up in 4 segments: Introduction which explores why Florida’s ban is based on bad analysis and the origins of Race as a Pseudoscience. My review of Berry’s Book “Price For Their Pound Of Flesh, And closing arguments and an update on how some Americans feel about the US Relief to Ukraine. We carried a podcast episode recently, talking about how Florida passed a ban on teaching students to “feel guilt” on history. It was also published as an article in last week's LinkedIn newsletter, "The Neoliberal Commentary". I wanted to add another point to the discussion surrounding this issue as we get into the topic of discussion for today, "Reimagining Peoples Within Critical Race Theory: Not Thinking Race And Moving Away from A Victim to A Hero Approach.” The point is that Florida's ban against teaching students to feel-guilt on history seems to be based on bad analysis, in that, it presumes that people aren’t responsible for their own emotions or their internal feelings or responses towards external stimuli. The fact is each person is different and unique and may have one feeling or reaction towards an external stimulus which differs from another when exposed to the same stimulus or stimuli. This is where Descartes was useful, when he arrived at “cogito ergo sum” (I think therefore I am)—pointing out that knowledge of reality is certain because of the inescapable proof of the reality of one's own mind in the very act of doubting one's own existence. This leads to the implication then, that we can’t really know anything outside of our own minds and reality of ourselves (See Descartes, Rene, “The Philosophical Works of Descartes, rendered into English,” Translated by Elizabeth S. Haldane and G.R.T. Ross, 1911). Therefore, we are only aware of our own feelings and are the only ones who can truly make sense of reality for ourselves. But this ban seems to blame the truth of history contained in lessons that is actually on schools' curricular or business programs aimed at developing diversity among their students and staff respectively. However, based on the subjective understanding of reality described by Descartes, we cannot assume a feeling for others, because we are outside of the realities of individuals, and individuals have minds that impress a subjective understanding of the experience of a particular reality or stimuli within their reality. Therefore, an experience and or feelings of guilt make up an individual's personality and subjective understanding of reality. The ban assumes an experience on everyone and comes to a conclusion about a personal response. Further, if people feel guilty from exposure to stimuli, isn’t this a normal human response given the fact that we have consciences and rationality based on our human consciousness and therefore an idea of justice, fairness and discrimination. Further, this ban gives students tremendous authority over the classroom and learning, for any student can now say they “feel guilt” from any lesson in history that is taught…. The rest of the discussion can be accessed at https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/reimagining-peoples-within-critical-race-theory-moving-mckenzie.